Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Land Shark who wrote (45563)	1/5/2014 12:44:42 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 86356

I have explained over and over current explanations of the natural cycles that have caused the observed changes over the past hundreds of years. IPCC models are the only so called science used to justify the speculated CO2 sensitivity that predicts Climate DOOM. That some scientists have fabricated evidence supporting the AGW hypothesis is a fact and speculation the pressures of media of lefty loon persuasions and politicians who want more reasons to spend other peoples money is not dishonest. Your statements about is libelous. And when I see this level of published work. Who is revealing themselves to be the true asshole? www-eaps.mit.edu

To: Land Shark who wrote (45563)	1/5/2014 1:22:32 PM
From: Brumar89	Respond to of 86356

I'll bet you're paid more by the oil industry every year than Lindzen has ever made.

To: Land Shark who wrote (45563)	1/5/2014 2:19:47 PM
From: Brumar89	2 Recommendations Recommended By Hawkmoon Thomas A Watson Respond to of 86356

Climate denial

To: Land Shark who wrote (45563)	1/5/2014 4:03:07 PM
From: teevee	3 Recommendations Recommended By FJB Hawkmoon longnshort Respond to of 86356

Landshark, He is a denier. He dishonestly asserts that somehow scientists are "forced" by media and politicians to fabricate evidence supporting the AGW hypothesis. He attributes warming to "natural cycles" (i.e. booga booga) without offering any explanation of what "natural" means. He has consulted to Exxon Mobil and other hydrocarbon companies (taking $2500 per day in fees). He's an industry shill. Your ad hominem doesn't cut it here. It only serves to point out how vapid your posts are, and your lack of intellect and ability to critically think and assess. Do yourself a favour and go get some schooling on how to think, read, and comprehend. Then leave your "green" politics and agenda at the door.