To: N. Dixon who wrote (823 ) 1/6/2014 6:13:58 AM From: Jorj X Mckie 1 RecommendationRecommended By Dale Baker
Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1604 Actually, Dale Baker did nothing of the sort. You responded to someone who referenced "that gal over at R3FR". Message 29216040 1. You weren't referenced by name 2. The message was to Dale, not from Dale 3. The message wasn't even particularly rude It turns out that he and bear down both had your number back then.http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=29242841 deeno, She must get paid 3 cents every time someone posts her favorite ticker. Her bait isn't even catching bait fish. To her, good, bad or ugly, as long as you mention her pet pig by symbol, she seems happy. http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=29245339 eh, shes transparent, but like a year or so of silence, she makes the first post (at least that I saw) sept 19 dragging bill out of bed and look at the volume and the movement after she resurrected Bill. Coincidence? Maybe SI still carries a bit of weight after all. But god you ever read anyone so relentless, If she wrote a column I'd have to wear a bib when I drank my coffee in the morning. But she does NEED a sparing partner And after bringing Kevin into the fray out of the blue, you pointed out that you loved the R3FR shout outhttp://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=29241119 Thanks for the shout out. I luv my R3FR! ND Message 29242838 Thanks. Appreciated the shout out. ND But look at what Deeno said:"I dont know. not rehashing over and over, staying on topic, not making personal attacks or politicizing a topic" That man has your number. 1. you are the queen of rehashing over and over 2. you don't appear to be able to stay on topic 3. Your whole M.O. is the personal attack 4. You tried desperately to politicize the conversation tonight