SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brumar89 who wrote (761570)1/6/2014 10:18:16 AM
From: Wharf Rat  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574273
 
It's nice to finally be jumping the turd of hurdles clogging up the Senate.

Janet Yellen expected to be confirmed by Senate as Fed chief Monday

http://www.latimes.com/business/money/la-fi-mo-federal-reserve-janet-yellen-senate-confirmation-vote-20140106,0,2872235.story#ixzz2pdEpw3Rp



To: Brumar89 who wrote (761570)1/6/2014 11:54:13 AM
From: FJB2 Recommendations

Recommended By
Brumar89
joseffy

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574273
 
Today, the same forces are operating. The Federal Housing Administration is requiring down payments of just 3.5 percent. Fannie and Freddie are requiring a mere 5 percent. According to the American Enterprise Institute’s National Mortgage Risk Index data set for Oct. 2013, about half of those getting mortgages to buy homes — not to refinance — put 5 percent or less down. When anyone suggests that down payments should be raised to the once traditional 10 or 20 percent, the outcry in Congress and from brokers and homebuilders is deafening. They claim that people will not be able to buy homes. What they really mean is that people won’t be able to buy expensive homes. When down payments were 10 to 20 percent before 1992, the homeownership rate was a steady 64 percent — slightly below where it is today — and the housing market was not frothy. People simply bought less expensive homes.

If we expect to prevent the next crisis, we have to prevent the next bubble, and we will never do that without eliminating leverage where it counts: among home buyers.
nytimes.com