SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sdgla who wrote (761723)1/6/2014 9:26:37 PM
From: TimF  Respond to of 1575191
 
1) taking advantage of low interest rates to spend money on high-return infrastructure projects

Except what is the odds the the high-return projects will be identified, selected, agreed on, started and the built at a reasonable cost?

2) with inflation quiescent, continued monetary stimulus from the Federal Reserve
That's risky for the long term, but depending on what you mean by continuing monetary stimulus it may be a good idea. If reducing additional injection of money (relative to demand for money which makes the point much more complex than it sounds) but not ending it for now means continuing it, then I might be behind continuing it.

3) rolling back oppressive occupation licensing requirements

Great idea. Although a broader regulatory rollback that included but wasn't limited to occupational licensing would be better.

4) reforming the federal disability-benefit system
Good idea, if rather unspecific.

5) admitting more high-skill immigrants

Good idea if perhaps unpopular.

6) giving unemployed workers a modest cash bonus when they secure employment

Not so sure about this one, but not a big deal either way.

7) paying jobless benefits monthly so workers who get a job at the beginning of a pay period could take in both unemployment compensation and a paycheck for that month

I'm not sure what the benefit would be here. People would get a payment after they started working, but they would have gotten that payment anyway, just earlier. It would likely have been more useful earlier.

8) temporarily reducing or eliminating the capital-gains tax on new business investment

I'm not much for temporary tax cuts. Even when your going for a stimulus rather than more long term growth (and my aim would be the later), tax cuts without an expiration (or with so long of expiration that people don't consider it much in their decision making) work better.

9) offer assistance to some long-term unemployed workers who want to start businesses

I'm not sure about the feds as venture capitalists, either at the high end (Solyndra, etc.) or this. Well this isn't so much an investment its being sold as a giveaway so at least its more honest. But still I'm not sure it would work very well.

10) relocation subsidies to the long-term unemployed to finance a good chunk of the costs of moving to a different part of the country with a better labor market

Not so high on this either, but maybe it would work a bit better than the last one.

11) significantly lowering the minimum wage for the long-term unemployed for at least the first six months after the date they begin work at their new job, and coupling that lower minimum with an expanded Earned Income Tax Credit or with wage subsidies exclusively available to the long-term unemployed

Well that would help the long term unemployed (at least for the six months) but it might disadvantage others that might in turn become long term unemployed. If the government's going to intervene in the labor market better this than a lot of other possibilities, but I don't really want it interfering in the first place.

12) greater work sharing where a company could cut hours by, say, 20% instead of 20% of workers and each worker could claim 20% of his unemployment benefit.

What about currently involuntarily part time unemployed? Also might this not encourage the marginal employer to cut hours?