Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (45727)	1/7/2014 3:16:03 PM
From: Land Shark	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 86356

You're once again wrong. There is a Lindzen model on climate change. He tried to prove that clouds would counteract any warming by CO2. Not even your denier standard bearer, Lindzen, denies that CO2 has a greenhouse effect. Lindzen argues incorrectly that clouds would have a cooling effect and counteract CO2 warming effect. His model proved the least accurate amongst them. You lie again. Lindzen is retired having being shamed by the academic circles. He lost the global warming battle. He was an extreme minority, bought and paid for by the Cato institute, Exxon, The Koch Bros and other hydrocarbon companies.