Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: I. N. Vester who wrote (1662)	12/10/1997 9:20:00 PM
From: wm sharp	Respond to of 27311

I.N. - Very sound post, IMO. I was never under the impression that December production was realistic; the company has indeed been claiming Q198 for some time. A seasoned investor, who's judgement I respect, suggested to me today that the seller could just as easily have been spooked by Korean economic developments. Well, I haven't seen many investors on this thread counting on solid Hanil numbers in their projections for next year. Ireland is what counts, in my humble opinion. As for all the crazed speculation re Cal's departure, I found post #18 on the Yahoo thread most interesting. As others have suggested as well, the company could be engaged in a delicate balancing act between getting the batteries right the first time, improving the specs for optimum contract negotiation, and appeasing shareholders. Under such a scenario, I, for one, would be pleased as punch with January production. But when it comes to squeezing the little guy, the people doing the squeezing love it when excuses like these come along. messages.yahoo.com@m2.yahoo.com