Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Presstek -- Stock of the Decade?? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nanny who wrote (7219)	12/11/1997 11:37:00 AM
From: Larry Ricker	Respond to of 11098

Nanny I try to keep from being provoked by your posts because, in contrast to many of the other bulls on this thread (Neil, Tom E, Olu, to name three), they are typically either pure cheerleading or aggressive attacks on others. Here's why I couldn't restrain myself yesterday: 1. JM Posted a list of PRST reps around the world (#7194). 2. Tom E. observed that Asia wasn't included, but speculated that they would be soon (#7196). Note: his opinion, not fact. 3. You sarcastically observed that Pierre had claimed earlier that breaking into the asian market would be difficult (#7209) 4. Pierre responded that he was still waiting for you to show him an instance where he had stated a fact that was later proven wrong (#7212). 5. dkmax again mentioned Pierre's opinion regarding the asian market (#7213) 6. You posted links to Pierre's original message regarding the asian market, followed by a series of links in which dkmax and Neil speculated that Pierre was wrong (#7214). In the whole series, the only fact is JM's list of PRST reps. If anything, this list supports Pierre's opinion. You use sarcasm, speculation, and innuendo (no facts) to suggest otherwise, and to attack Pierre's credibility. Pierre doesn't need me to defend him, but I jumped in anyway. Larry