SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Ride the Tiger with CD -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: SwampDogg who wrote (232822)1/10/2014 9:20:23 AM
From: ayeyou  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 313570
 
Porphyry deposits no go LMAO . They have only been mining this one since 1863....

Over its life, Bingham Canyon has proven to be one of the world's most productive mines. As of 2004, ore from the mine has yielded more than 17 million tons (15.4 Mt) of copper, 23 million ounces (715 t) of gold, 190 million ounces (5,900 t) of silver, and 850 million pounds (386 kt) of molybdenum. The value of the resources extracted from the Bingham Canyon Mine is greater than the Comstock Lode, Klondike, and California gold rush mining regions combined. Mines in Chile, Indonesia, Arizona, and New Mexico now exceed Bingham Canyon's annual production rate. High molybdenum prices in 2005 made the molybdenum produced at Bingham Canyon in that year worth even more than the copper. [10] The value of metals produced in 2006 at Bingham Canyon was US$1.8 billion. [11



To: SwampDogg who wrote (232822)1/10/2014 9:26:34 AM
From: LoneClone  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 313570
 
Porphyry + Indonesia = no way .

Hey even one of those things is a no go

Maybe in your world; not in mine. I have come out ahead, albeit not by much, in my investing in companies operating in Indonesia over the years, and made a lot of money by investing in companies exploring for, developing, and producing from porphyries.

You are ignoring hundreds if not thousands of potentially profitable investments. Pity.

LC