SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Oracle Corporation (ORCL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kirk © who wrote (4335)12/10/1997 9:37:00 PM
From: Joe Antol  Respond to of 19080
 
Kirk (you're takin' Brock Meeks line <g>) >>Oracle might be a decent value play now as discussed in the article.<<

>> Do others here agree? <<

Well, without a doubt, IMHO I do.

If you took a 1K share stake yesterday, your looking at 7-10G off the table in the next 3 months IMHO.

Period.

Regards,

Joe...

PS: I hope it DOES blow down to 20 or below. I'll buy another 2K shares.



To: Kirk © who wrote (4335)12/12/1997 2:58:00 PM
From: Andrew Fenic  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 19080
 
I think what will drive ORCL forward in 1998 is tremendous "pent-up" demand for Oracle 8. In a way the situation is similar to Windows95. Companies are cautious about making the upgrade because they do not want to be the first to have a potentially buggy major upgrade bring their system to its knees. Once it becomes clear that many large institutions are on the Oracle 8 bandwagon, ORCL will experience very strong earnings and revenue growth that characterizes a new product cycle. And all indications are that, except for a few minor glitches, Oracle 8 is a solid product that will become the industry standard database. Right now it is simply goin through the usual new product teething pains.

In a way I'm glad Sedona never made it out. That product had the potential to destroy Oracle's reputation as a provider of relatively stable scalable software products; coupling it with Oracle8 could have been a disaster as Sedona's reputation might have been linked with the database upgrade.