SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Silicon Investor - User Site Discussion - Generally Unmodera -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: greg s who wrote (881)1/11/2014 9:17:19 PM
From: SI Ron (Crazy Music Man)1 Recommendation

Recommended By
ravenseye

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1604
 
I would like to see one that keeps track of members who say they are quitting and never actually leave. <g>



To: greg s who wrote (881)1/11/2014 9:29:39 PM
From: greenspirit  Respond to of 1604
 
Interesting idea, not sure how you would build an objective tool to measure that, but I suppose they could try.

We could also also track posters who come up with the most idiotic enhancement ideas.



To: greg s who wrote (881)1/11/2014 10:23:16 PM
From: marcos5 Recommendations

Recommended By
Bear Down
Dale Baker
greg s
Snowshoe
Tom C

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1604
 
How about a list of most-read posters ... simple numbers of posts submitted wouldn't mean much, even if you stripped out political threads which you'd absolutely have to do, there would still be partisan bickering on trading threads and all the other moronosity that boosts post volume and contributes nothing

Peoplemarks are of limited value as a metric, because so many of them are old ... and here's an odd thing [maybe not that odd?] - i realised a while ago that several of the posters i follow most closely i do not have peoplemarked, why, because i know where they are, always show up on various threads i start with, it's easy to follow their bios from there, never thought to peoplemark them ... rectified that with three or four, including Mario who got poofed by mgmt upthread here, find his chart work highly useful, probably have missed a few others though

Also with peoplemarks, many of mine haven't posted for years, some have but i don't really follow them, so of what value is that ... it's who gets read that counts ... further - it's who gets searched out for reading, so if you could separate out who gets read earlier in each lurking session you'd have something more meaningful

And at some point you end up with a situation that so much data is collected and sorted and attributed that it just ain't fun anymore, gets creepy ... eh ... so have you learned your lesson greg, about setting up ABSOLUTELY UNMODERATED threads, lol - see what it gets you, annoying old biddies pumping some perennial loser of a stock and a pajama boy or three sucking up to a misguided management and/or getting back at Dale for some perceived political wrong elsewhere ... nothing about the structure and future of SI, which is implied by the rest of your title, and was what you had in mind, seemed to me



To: greg s who wrote (881)1/12/2014 1:34:29 PM
From: Dale Baker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1604
 
All the huffing and puffing here ironically made it one of the hottest new threads on SI, LOL. The more they try to knock down and tear down, the more attention they draw to the issues raised.

Oops.