Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: zax who wrote (763588)	1/13/2014 1:57:17 PM
From: longnshort	1 Recommendation Recommended By joseffy Respond to of 1573941

plame wasn't undercover, she worked a desk. everyone in her neighbor when asked where she worked said the CIA. Her husband would tell people at cocktail parties that she worked there. just bull shit made up by the lamestream media

To: zax who wrote (763588)	1/13/2014 1:58:12 PM
From: Sdgla	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573941

Except I never believed Bush was directly involvedin the Plame affair - exposing an undercover CIA operative as retribution for her husband's report was arsehole Dick Cheney's thing. Old news ... WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Former Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage acknowledged Thursday that he was the source who first revealed the identity of CIA officer Valerie Plame to syndicated columnist Robert Novak back in 2003, touching off a federal investigation. Armitage told the CBS Evening News that he did so inadvertently. "I feel terrible," Armitage said. "Every day, I think, I let down the president. I let down the secretary of state. I let down my department, my family, and I also let down Mr. and Mrs. Wilson."

To: zax who wrote (763588)	1/13/2014 2:01:55 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1573941

Zax, The real question is whether this goes higher in NJ. And I and most do believe that Christie was directly involved. What I find hard to believe is that even the NYTimes couldn't publish any "smoking guns" directly linking Christie to the lane closures. The millisecond something turns up, they would rush it onto their web site in order to beat out, say, HuffPo and DailyKos. Either there really is no direct link, or the Christie administration did an amazingly efficient job keeping all of this a "safe distance" away from the governor himself. Tenchusatsu