SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: combjelly who wrote (764235)1/16/2014 4:44:44 PM
From: jlallen1 Recommendation

Recommended By
FJB

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573558
 
To make it work, 25% of those signing up have to be in their 20s.

Wrong.

40% are needed to make Odumbocare work....far short of where the numbers are.....at 24%...its a disaster.



To: combjelly who wrote (764235)1/16/2014 4:45:44 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1573558
 
Your figures are screwed up. The 18-34 demographic, if representative, needed to be above 39% according to original White House estimates. The number at this point is 24% if we have been told the truth! a big if. This figure is below the level Kaiser had forecast as it's 'worst case scenario.'

Perhaps of even greater concern, however, is the relative health of the 24%. As it turns out, when you're getting only 24% of the young demographic, you're getting mostly young, sick people, not the healthy ones you actually need. So instead of supporting the risk pool, they may be contributing little, if anything on a net basis.

Insurance is one area where these estimates are not bullshit. If the actuaries say you need 39% it isn't going to turn out that you only need 30.



To: combjelly who wrote (764235)1/16/2014 4:50:28 PM
From: Bill2 Recommendations

Recommended By
Brumar89
i-node

  Respond to of 1573558
 
As the comedian Jimmy Kimmel asked in his monologue the other night, if they needed 20-somethings to make Obamacare work, why did they allow them stay free on their parents' family plans til age 26?

Just government logic, I guess.