Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: koan who wrote (764360)	1/17/2014 1:32:54 PM
From: Blasher	1 Recommendation Recommended By joseffy Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1573782

YOU have overlooked the fact that 97% of atmospheric scientists make more money when they say they believe in Man-Caused-Climate-Change. YOU also overlook the fact that only 0.00000001% of people actually spoke to any scientist about this and it is only their story that gets spread around . . . so really, no one knows for sure how many atmospheric scientists believe in Man-Caused-Climate-Change. YOU also have overlooked the fact that NO ONE spoke with ALL atmospheric scientists . . . therefore, saying that 97% of atmospheric scientists believe anything is incorrect. It should actually read that some people say that 97% of the atmospheric scientists they spoke to believe in Man-Caused-Climate-Change

To: koan who wrote (764360)	1/17/2014 1:36:41 PM
From: joseffy	Respond to of 1573782

97% of muslims are for Hussein Obama.

To: koan who wrote (764360)	1/17/2014 1:37:40 PM
From: joseffy	Respond to of 1573782

97% of Red Chinese Communists are for Commie Obammie.

To: koan who wrote (764360)	1/17/2014 5:19:08 PM
From: Bilow	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573782

Hi koan; Re: "And you think that 97% of atmospheric scientist's overlooked all your information huh?": 97% of atmospheric scientists agree with me on the subjects of those 97% polls: (1) The climate has been getting warmer over the last 200 years. (2) Mankind contributes to recent rise in temperatures. Your error is in assuming that the above implies a "catastrophe". No. Let's look at the evidence. According to you, the planet has been drastically warmed by CO2 over the last 30 years or so. And this will be a big catastrophe for humans. But by every measure, humans are doing better now than they were 30 years ago. There is less starvation. There is more use of energy. People live longer lives. Medicine has improved. Fewer people die in natural disasters. So if the climate is going against man, the evidence is that man makes progress faster than the climate moves. And so there is no catastrophe. What's more, you have almost no peer reviewed articles that claim that there is a catastrophe. Instead, 97% of them talk about various levels of warming, not about what consequences there are for humans. And the reason for this is pretty obvious. Humans have been thriving in the recent warm weather. We're doing great! You live a life of fear because you're too stupid to understand the literature. You live with boogey-men hiding around corners, a world of superstitious nonsense. And you lost the political fight over CO2. That's why the planet's CO2 production sets new records every year. So sorry, but you failed. Now your grandchildren will have to live the hell that exists in your dreams. -- Carl