Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (764539)	1/18/2014 2:54:15 PM
From: jlallen	Respond to of 1574269

LOL!! What a dipshit.

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (764539)	1/18/2014 3:08:27 PM
From: koan	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1574269

You pulled that right out of your ass. What evidence do you have to back that up? I.e. your contention scientist's vote Democratic for grants. That is totally nutso thinking. That is typical right wing rationalization when they are caught in something they don't like and can't explain away. Scientist's shun the Republican party, because the party shuns science e.g. evolution and global warming. Duh!-lol

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (764539)	1/18/2014 7:15:04 PM
From: koan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574269

A pollster asks a scientist if he is a dem or pub. And your theory is he says dem because he wants a grant. But the Pollster isn't giving him the grant. The pollster is just taking a poll. Scientist also doesn't know if pollster is demo or pub, and even if he was, or if it was the person giving the grant, saying he was an independent would be the smartest thing to say. Keep his political affiliation in the dark. That is the smart play, and scientist's are smart. Why not just face the truth. Scientists don't like the Republican party because it is anti intellectual and anti science. Now doesn't that make a lot more sense!?