SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Chuzzlewit who wrote (4789)12/11/1997 12:16:00 AM
From: soozathelooza  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 95453
 
paul..

very well put.

like the old adage says:

"past performance is no guarantee
of future return"

to me...this rings true for TA.
actually, it rings true for the whole
market place, but my personal preference remains FA.

paul.



To: Chuzzlewit who wrote (4789)12/11/1997 12:51:00 AM
From: james paterson  Respond to of 95453
 
Paul,
I generally agree with your assessment of TA being anecdotal. On the other hand it seems reckless, not to mention expensive to ignore strong sell signals. If volume starts to dry up & price stalls.....guess what happens. Not really TA, just common sense.

James



To: Chuzzlewit who wrote (4789)12/11/1997 1:15:00 AM
From: Iceberg  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 95453
 
>All of the data suggest that market prices follow a random walk.

Paul,

If stock prices are random, then there is no need for us to discuss either TA or FA. The inference is that neither TA or FA makes any difference.

Ice


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News