SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : How Quickly Can Obama Totally Destroy the US? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Taro who wrote (7347)1/21/2014 9:56:15 AM
From: joseffy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 16547
 
“Never before in our history has a president done these things.”

.................................................................................................................



WASHINGTON — An unprecedented abuse of powers. The most un-American president in the nation’s history.


Nat Hentoff says it is time to begin looking into impeachment.

Hentoff sees the biggest problem as Obama’s penchant to rule by executive order when he can’t convince Congress to do things his way.

The issue jumped back into the headlines last week when, just before his first Cabinet meeting of 2014, Obama said, “I’ve got a pen and I’ve got a phone … and I can use that pen to sign executive orders and take executive actions.”

“Apparently he doesn’t give one damn about the separation of powers,” Hentoff told WND. “Never before in our history has a president done these things.”


Read more at wnd.com



To: Taro who wrote (7347)1/21/2014 1:17:03 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
Soros' Politico sells disgraced jornolist Ezra Klein to the hilt.

Never mentions his only claim to fame--founding the jornolist group to smear those who dared to mention Obama's mentor Rev. "God Damn America" Wright

politico.com



To: Taro who wrote (7347)1/21/2014 1:30:39 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
Carlos Slim Still Reaping Big Rewards From NY Times Loan
.......................................................................................................
By Edmund Lee Jan 21, 2014
bloomberg.com
Billionaire Carlos Slim.

Billionaire Carlos Slim is poised to double his money after investing $250 million in a 2009 lending agreement with the New York Times, showing how dearly the newspaper’s owners paid for his help.

Slim, who controls mobile-phone carrier America Movil SAB and is the world’s second-richest person according to data compiled by Bloomberg, already has earned $122 million from his loan to the Times, based on an annual interest rate of 14 percent and a 12 percent premium charged to the company when its debt to Slim was redeemed in 2011.


Under the terms of the loan, the Times still owes Slim additional shares worth as much as $141 million based on the Jan. 17 stock price, thanks to options he received to buy shares at what is now a deep discount.

Slim’s loan to the Times gave the publisher time to sell some assets and bolster a digital-subscription strategy to offset slumping ad sales. The agreement with Slim required the parent New York Times Co. to accept terms that effectively reduced a stock market windfall five years later. By selling 15.9 million shares at a fraction of their market value, the company risked giving up more than $100 million it could raise through an offering to the public.

“The Times had financial issues when they borrowed money from Carlos Slim,” said Thomas Graham Kahn, president of Kahn Brothers Advisors, a Times Co. investor. “They’ve gone from a position of having to pay high interest rates on their loans to where they’re net cash-positive.”

Arturo Elias, a spokesman for Slim, declined to comment, as did Abbe Serphos, a spokeswoman for Times Co.

Interest Rate The 14 percent interest rate charged to Times Co. on Slim’s loan, which was announced Jan. 19, 2009, compared with the average bond yield of 13.41 percent that day for similarly rated borrowers on the Bank of America Merrill Lynch 1-to-10-Year BB U.S. High Yield Index. Standard & Poor’s rated Times Co. BB- at the time, three steps below investment grade. The publisher’s ranking is now one step lower at B+.

The interest on Slim’s loan was the highest rate Times Co. paid on debt dating back to at least 1995, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

As of last week’s close, Slim’s profit from the loan stood at $263 million, including the loan’s interest and premiums and the warrants issued by Times Co. as part of the loan deal. They let Slim buy shares for $6.36 apiece, less than half Times Co.’s $15.22 close last week in New York trading. That gives Slim $8.94 in potential profit for each of the 15.9 million shares he’s allowed to buy.

Expiration Date The warrants expire on Jan. 15, 2015 -- meaning Slim must make his move soon. The company has set aside the shares and is prepared to sell them whenever Slim exercises the warrants.

Times Co. gave Slim such a profitable deal because it found itself under pressure in early 2009, with a $400 million credit line months away from expiring. Rather than hurry to sell off businesses for cash amid the chaos of the global financial crisis, the company made the deal with Slim, giving it breathing room it used to eventually find buyers for units such as About.com and the Boston Globe.

The interest on Slim’s loan cost Times Co. about $35 million a year -- more than double what it was paying in interest for the expiring credit line. By late 2010, the publisher was able to raise the money it needed to refinance Slim’s loan, issuing $225 million of six-year bonds with a more palatable 6.625 percent coupon.

Risks Remained While the loan paid a good interest rate, and the warrants offered the chance for a profit, Slim’s deal with Times Co. wasn’t without risk. Newspapers were hemorrhaging as the Internet provided competition for advertising. Times Co.’s sales had dropped 8 percent in 2008, and they continued to decline every year until 2012.

Still, Slim continued to express confidence in Times Co.’s management and its controlling owners, the Ochs-Sulzbergers. The family has turned things around by beginning to charge a subscription for online access, cutting costs and hiring an outside chief executive officer in Mark Thompson.

Thompson is determined to create new digital-subscription products while reorganizing the sales staff to buoy advertising revenue. Times Co. hit a five-year closing high of $16.09 at the end of last year.

“I don’t see why their earnings should not take them up to $20 a share in a few years,” said Kahn, whose firm holds 5.4 million Times Co. shares.

Daunting Task The company still faces a daunting task in vying for subscribers and advertising dollars, and only one out of nine analysts who cover the stock recommends buying it, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

A $263 million return is still a drop in the bucket for Slim, whose $69.6 billion fortune puts him behind only Bill Gates among the world’s richest, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index. Slim, who turns 74 next week, gets most of his net worth from the companies he controls in Mexico, led by America Movil, Latin America’s biggest wireless company.

Besides his Times Co. stock warrants, Slim also holds 11.9 million shares of the company, mostly accumulated before the loan deal. He didn’t disclose what he paid for the bulk of that stock, making it difficult to calculate how much he has profited from the stake, though he has collected about $1 million in dividend payments.

What’s clear is that lending money to Times Co. helped the company recover from a low point, protecting that early investment.

Bigger Stake If the billionaire chooses to exercise his warrants and keep the shares, he would own almost a fifth of Times Co. Slim’s loan in 2009 raised concerns that one of the most venerated U.S. newspapers would be beholden to the Mexican billionaire, who battles accusations of being a telecommunications monopolist in his home country. “Who is Carlos Slim, and does he want the paper of record?” read a headline in the New Yorker. “Let’s keep an eye on Senor Slim,” media columnist Jack Shafer wrote in Slate.

A takeover, however, is unlikely given the publisher’s dual-class share structure, which gives the Ochs-Sulzberger family a firm grip over the company’s board.

Slim is already the publisher’s second-largest shareholder with about 8 percent. His stake only allows him to vote for Class A directors, a group that represents no more than a third of the company’s board seats. The Ochs-Sulzberger family’s Class B shares let it elect the remaining two-thirds of the board, giving it effective and lasting control. Class B shares aren’t publicly traded.

Slim has consistently said he believed the publisher would overcome its struggles because its reputation and name recognition would help it survive the difficult transition from print to the Internet.



To: Taro who wrote (7347)1/22/2014 10:51:33 AM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
Climate scientist Judith Curry challenges Mann on calling her "anti-science" b/o her truthful Senate testimony:

Climate alarmist and Hockeystick inventor gets in hot water after more hot airMichael Mann called a fellow scientist, but climate sceptic, "anti-Science" after her Congressional Testimony, but the tables have been turned on him in spectacular fashionby Climate Realist on 21 January 2014 17:53

If anyone out there thought that scientists were a bunch of genteel, Queensbury rules respecting gentlemen-types they've obviously never seen climate alarmists and climate sceptics going at each other like their lives depended on it.

That's not to draw a parallel and to declare each side as guilty as the other. The "consensus" scientists are almost always the ones playing the dirty tricks and calling the names. But when the other side fights back, it's not just instructive about the state of the "consensus" itself, it's downright entertaining.

Bring on Fred Singer, professor emeritus at the University of Virginia and director of the Science & Environmental Policy Project writing in the American Thinker. He's got it in for Michael Mann -- or "Hide the decline" Mike, as he calls him -- director of the Earth System Science Center at Pennsylvania State University, inventor of the so called "Hockeystick" and one of the most famous climate alarmists in the world.

What has got Singer all riled up is a recent piece written by Mann in the New York Times where he starts playing the victim about all the grief he's got for the fact his theories have all turned out to be wrong, and an accusation he made against a fellow scientist's testimony last week to Congress.

Let the fun begin. Before he gets going himself, Singer brings in Ross McKitrick, a well known scientist who long ago trashed the whole Hockeystick nonsense for what it was. Responding to Mann's New York Times op-ed, which was entitled "If you see something, say something.", McKitrick retorted:

"OK, I see a second-rate scientist carrying on like a jackass and making a public nuisance of himself."

Singer plainly thinks this is far too tame: "OK, I want to say something too," he says.

"I see an ideologue, desperately trying to support a hypothesis that's been falsified by observations. While the majority of climate alarmists are trying to discover a physical reason that might just save the AGW hypothesis, Mann simply ignores the 'inconvenient truth' that the global climate has not warmed significantly for at least the past 15 years -- while emissions of greenhouse gases have surged globally."

According to Singer, Mann had launched an attack on "the Senate testimony (Jan 16, 2014) of fiercely independent climate scientist and blogger, Georgia Tech professor Judith Curry."

She was none too impressed. And responded as follows:

"Since you have publicly accused my Congressional testimony of being 'anti-science,' I expect you to (publicly) document and rebut any statement in my testimony that is factually inaccurate or where my conclusions are not supported by the evidence that I provide."

Surely Mann will Mann-up and respond to the challenge. After all, he wouldn't be afraid of a serious debate with a serious opponent, now would he?

http://www.thecommentator.com/article/4635/climate_alarmist_and_hockeystick_inventor_gets_in_hot_water_after_more_hot_air#.Ut7dhBeZzE0.twitter

credit brumar



To: Taro who wrote (7347)1/24/2014 2:10:48 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
Being On The Wrong Side of A Rabid Progressive Regime…

Posted on January 24, 2014 by sundance



#1 - Federal prosecutors are now in New Jersey conducting a preliminary inquiry into accusations that aides to Gov. Chris Christie shut down access lanes to the George Washington Bridge as political retribution. And have issued grand jury subpoenas to Mr. Christie’s re-election campaign and to the state Republican Party, the lawyer for the campaign and the party said Thursday. (link)

#2 - Dinesh D’Souza, a conservative commentator, best-selling author and the director of the anti-Obama film “2016: Obama’s America” was indicted by a federal court today. The movie, the second highest domestic grossing political documentary in the United States since 1982, was a huge success before the 2012 elections. Indicted by a federal grand jury for arranging excessive campaign contributions to a candidate for the U.S. Senate. According to an indictment made public on Thursday in federal court in Manhattan, D’Souza around August 2012 reimbursed people who he had directed to contribute $20,000 to the candidate’s campaign. The candidate was not named in the indictment. (link)

#3 - Conservative activist James O’Keefe is accusing New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s administration of targeting his group with document requests and a subpoena, claiming the Democratic governor’s recent comments critical of conservatives “aren’t simply words.” O’Keefe, whose Project Veritas is behind a series of hidden-camera investigations against left-leaning groups and causes, made the claims on the heels of the controversy over a recent Cuomo interview. In it, Cuomo blasted “extreme conservatives who are right-to-life, pro-assault-weapon, anti-gay” and said they “have no place” in New York. He later walked back his remarks, and said they were being taken out of context in the media. ( link)

#4 - In a famously left-leaning Hollywood, where Democratic fund-raisers fill the
social calendar, Friends of Abe stands out as a conservative group that bucks
the prevailing political winds. [...] Last week, federal tax authorities presented the group with a 10-point request for detailed information about its meetings with politicians like Paul D. Ryan, Thaddeus McCotter and Herman Cain, among other matters, according to people briefed on the inquiry. (link)



Sen. Chuck Schumer (D., N.Y.) openly proposed using the Internal Revenue Service to curtail Tea Party group funding during a speech on how to “exploit” and “weaken” the movement at the Center for American Progress on Thursday. ( read more)

http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2014/01/24/being-on-the-wrong-side-of-an-rabid-progressive-regime/#more-75806

Schumer Calls for Using IRS to Curtail Tea Party Activities
Democratic senator says Obama should bypass Congress, use executive powers

BY: Alana Goodman
January 23, 2014 5:38 pm

Sen. Chuck Schumer (D., N.Y.) proposed using the Internal Revenue Service to curtail Tea Party group funding during a speech on how to “exploit” and “weaken” the movement at the Center for American Progress on Thursday.
...........
http://freebeacon.com/schumer-calls-for-using-irs-to-curtail-tea-party-activities/

credit brumar