Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bilow who wrote (765221)	1/22/2014 4:45:16 PM
From: THE WATSONYOUTH	Respond to of 1573682

*proposing less stringent targets than in the pastin a reflection of tougher economic circumstances and a desire to limit rising energy costs*. ....I thought the world would come to an end if we didn't stop this Global Warming in its tracks......reminds me of an old Andy Capp cartoon......when the Missus finally berates Andy one time too many.....he gets up, puts on his cap and coat, gathers up his pigeons, and, as he's going out the door, announces to the world....."OK ...I've had it.....I'm turning a new leaf. ...starting a new life.....I'm leaving for good.........then in the next frame Andy comes trudging back in the door and announces "It's raining".................God, I loved that strip

To: Bilow who wrote (765221)	1/22/2014 11:53:58 PM
From: Wharf Rat	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573682

Their goal is to reduce GHGs by 40% below 1990 levels in the next 16 years. What's not to like? Europe Just Set Out To Cut Its Carbon Emissions 40 Percent By 2030 By Jeff Spross on January 22, 2014 at 5:06 pm The European Commission laid out a new set of climate goals today, including a pledge to cut greenhouse gas emissions 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030. The targets are mostly binding for every member state of the European Union (EU), and the negotiations reportedly involved intense wrangling right up to the last minute. The major points of the agreement include: A 40 percent cut in greenhouse gas emissions from their 1990 levels by 2030. The previous target, set in 2007, was for a 20 percent cut from the 1990 levels by 2020. Even today observers had worried the Commission might opt for a 35 percent cut instead. Getting 27 percent of the EU’s energy from renewables by 2030. The 2007 target was 20 percent by 2020. Improved energy efficiency. The ostensible goal is a 25 percent increase in efficiency by 2030, but unlike the other targets it isn’t binding. The previous goal was a 20 percent increase by 2020. The agreement involves a few other goals, such as reforming the EU emissions trading system (ETS) — which hit significant trouble in the last few years, thanks partially to the recession and partially to poor design — and new-and-improved systems for monitoring compliance and progress. It also punted on applying any real legal oversight to shale gas development, thanks largely to a lobbying push from the British government. Reaction to the goals, both positive and negative, was swift. Environmental groups denounced them as inadequate, and Greenpeace in particular said a meaningful effort to tackle climate change would require a 55 percent cut in emissions by 2030. In December, Kevin Anderson, a climate scientists at the Tyndall Center, sent an open letter to the European Commission, insisted an 80 percent cut by 2030 was needed to keep global warming below the 2°C threshold. The commissioners themselves defended the agreement as a real step forward that made the most of what was realistically possible. The EU has already essentially reached the previous goal of a 20 percent cut in emissions — seven years ahead of schedule — suggesting the European Commission has a habit of underestimating how swiftly and deeply the European economy can actually reduce its contributions to climate change. A major study from the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, along with 11 other supporting research groups, recently concluded that the 40 percent cut by 2030 would cost a mere 0.7 percent of the European economy. The technologies necessary to make it happen are low-cost and already in the pipeline: further deployment of renewable energy, more energy efficiency, and more nuclear power, for example. EU leaders have proposed an even more ambitious long-term cut in emissions: 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. The study acknowledged that new technologies that aren’t currently available will be needed to hit that target. But lead researcher Brigitte Knopf pointed out that setting ambitious targets now — through mechanisms like the ETS — will send price signals throughout the European economy to spur that innovation. As a territory, Europe is the world’s third largest carbon emitter, just behind North America in second place and Asia in first place. Europe’s carbon emissions per person are also significantly lower than North America’s. The framework makes the EU the first group of nations to lay down concrete emissions targets ahead of the international climate talks in Paris in 2015, though the goals still have to be agreed upon by the EU parliament. thinkprogress.org