SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Ascend Communications (ASND) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: sepku who wrote (27521)12/11/1997 6:31:00 AM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph  Respond to of 61433
 
South Korean oil companies hit by demand for LCs Reuters Story - December 11, 1997 04:25 %&64 %CRU %PROD %FIN %DBT %SHP %KR %MEAST %US %GB %NL %BNK 44510.KS 44530.KS 44520.KS TX CHV V%REUTER P%RTR By Raj Rajendran SINGAPORE, Dec 11 (Reuters) - Beleaguered South Korean oil companies have been dealt another blow as suppliers demanded letters of credit (LCs) for every sale, industry sources said on Thursday. The companies, previously given open credit terms by their trading partners, including major oil companies, must now produce LCs from reputable international banks, the sources said. One source at a major oil company said he had received instructions to refer all deals back to the head office. "The deals will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis and there will be no open credit," he said. "Before, only some Korean oil companies needed LCs, but now everybody does, and not from Korean banks but only from first class international banks," a trader with a European oil company said. The sources said all oil companies have taken some form of action to check their exposure in South Korea in the wake of the financial crisis. The South Korean won has lost 51 percent of its value against the dollar so far this year, the stock market has plunged and despite having the world's 11th largest economy the country has had to secure a $57 billion International Monetary Fund rescue package. Industry sources said the impact on the five oil refiners under pressure to produce LCs would vary. Those belonging to large conglomerates, or chaebols, were seen as more likely to weather the storm with the least pain. South Korea's five refiners were Yukong Ltd , Hanwha Energy , LG-Caltex Oil Corp, Hyundai Oil Refinery Co,(an affiliate of the Hyundai Group [HYGR.CN]), and Ssangyong Oil Refining Co . The refiners have a capacity to refine 2.5 million barrels a day of crude, the third largest amount among Asian countries. Those with links to foreign multinationals may also have an advantage. Ssangyong Oil, for example, can look to its 35 percent shareholder, Saudi Arabian state-owned Saudi Aramco for crude supplies on more favourable terms, one trader said. LG-Caltex also has strong overseas ties. The second largest refiner is a joint venture between the LG Group and Caltex Petroleum Corp, itself a joint venture between Texaco Inc and Chevron Corp . Texaco said on Monday that its share of dollar denominated debt losses from its LG-Caltex venture will be $175 million for this year. South Korean oil companies had chalked up operating profit growth of up to 40 percent but the bottomline should fall by between 30 to 40 percent when foreign currency losses are factored in, analyst Bill Hunsaker of ING-Barings Securities said. "The oil companies are not suffering right now. They are only suffering from translation loss," he told Reuters earlier. Traders said the need to produce LCs had already clipped the South Korean companies' trading activities with most of them no longer active participants in the Singapore over-the-counter oil product swaps market. "I've not seen them in the swaps market for sometime now," one broker said. He said on a good day the South Korean companies' trading volume on the swaps market reached tens of millions of dollars.



To: sepku who wrote (27521)12/11/1997 8:35:00 AM
From: Sector Investor  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 61433
 
<<Meaning it cannot issue new shares to the degree necessary to finance a multi-billion $
aquisition, correct?>>

No, my understanding is just the pooling of assets method is restricted.