SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (765547)1/24/2014 3:29:56 PM
From: SilentZ  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1576159
 
>The administrative costs per patient is higher for Medicare than for private insurance. The way Medicare reduces the percentage is by blowing up the actual benefits paid out to patients, but that's full of fraud, waste, and potentially unnecessary treatments.

I gave you numbers for SS, not Medicare.

Comparing Medicare to private insurance isn't apples-to-apples, for the reason the Forbes article states to support its argument (rather illogically):

But here's the catch: because Medicare is devoted to serving a population that is elderly, and therefore in need of greater levels of medical care, it generates significantly higher expenditures than private insurance plans, thus making administrative costs smaller as a percentage of total costs. This creates the appearance that Medicare is a model of administrative efficiency. What Jon Alter sees as a "miracle" is really just a statistical sleight of hand.

Of course it's more expensive because people are older. Private insurance wouldn't insure those people at all! Which is, of course, the point of Medicare.

>Do you realize that you basically patronized the motives and charity of those whose contributions you were trying to solicit?

It's not patronizing. It's the truth. And if you understand that, you get a lot further as a fundraiser. 95-5% is probably hyperbole, but most donations from philanthropists are far from selfless.

>If that's the case, what I said stands. Philanthropists should just donate their money to government.

Except government just doesn't work that way. This is such a silly point.

>Don't mind the fact that trust in government is at an all time low.

Because of the political side of things. But that doesn't mean that it's not helping lots of people that ultimately wouldn't be helped.

-Z