Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (46762)	1/26/2014 3:45:46 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 86356

The paper was published and peer reviewed in 2010 even after all the bull in non published blogs putting it down. A peer reviewed put down was published commenting on the 2010 paper. That review was also trashed in publish peer reviewed space. Also the 2010 paper is really in the basics no different than the 2008 version. If you are too stupid to comprehend how 2010 peer reviewed does not trash all former garbage out of your bozo blogs, well all are laughing. And reality is the observations falsify every greenhouse effect as modelled. No observations falsify the proffer there is no CO2 green house effect.