SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bread Upon The Water who wrote (243338)1/29/2014 12:54:12 PM
From: T L Comiskey  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 541771
 
re...Well, do we want raise our taxes to pay the Canadians for the energy they won't get to sell

how bout we charge them a use fee...for crapping in the (our) atmosphere.....

Dr James Hansen...suggests...150 $$ per ton.............(or about..450/ton for CO2).....for each ton of pure carbon..

(the 2 + parts O...comes from the well shared atmosphere..)

wwwp.dailyclimate.org



To: Bread Upon The Water who wrote (243338)1/29/2014 1:07:28 PM
From: Wharf Rat  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 541771
 
"do we want raise our taxes to pay the Canadians for the energy they won't get to sell

Nope. It's their loss. They shudda done this in '55, or even '73, when nobody was paying attention. They snoozed, they can lose. I wouldn't mind raising taxes so we use less, tho.

His Hansen) proposal calls for a “simple, honest” carbon fee, collected from fossil-fuel companies upon the first sale at the mine, wellhead or port of entry.

The money collected via this fee would be distributed to the public as a monthly “dividend” or “green check.” Distributing all of the revenue equitably to households will ensure that families can afford the energy they need during the transition to a clean energy future, and it should help win public support for a rising carbon fee.

carbontax.org

I'd means test it, so half the money goes into green infrastructure stuff, rather than the wallets of the well-off, which is actually what I want... well off.