Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: longnshort who wrote (766991)	1/30/2014 1:11:15 PM
From: joseffy	Respond to of 1577883

Left Absolutely Drooling in Anticipation of Threatened Obama Diktats... As President Obama repeated previous threats to abuse his Executive Order powers in an otherwise most eye-wateringly dull SOTU in recent memory, he claimed to have a ' drawer full of ideas' he's like to implement with them. I'm sure they're real good ones, too- think economic folly, mass amnesty, and bird-brained 'green' initiatives of all sorts... On the other side (technically), the GOP's fat-n-happy 'leadership' is too lazy/cowardly to go after Obama for lying and breaking the law all the time, and are expected by the WH to also cave on immigration and other issues if he hectors them enough. Thus, the threats of Stalinesque diktats if Boehner doesn't lay down like he usually does. But *this talk of a brave new world where Obama frees himself of bothersome constitutional restraints and just directly tells us all what to -or else-* has libs absolutely frothing-at-the-mouth*... they love* this kind of crap: Debbie Wasserman Schultz: 'The President is going to have to use his executive authority' -...and I agree that he should use his executive authority because if the Republicans continue to try to be obstructionists, then we’ve got to make progress!" Noted constitutional scholar Sheila Jackson Lee: "Executive orders are legal" because he's just trying to help and protect us, "acting ‘on behalf of the American people" Well, that sounds peachy- good to hear he's on our side, what kind of mean person would oppose that?. Then we've got MSNBC's Ed Schultz: "Obama Is exactly right to take action without Congress..." Of course! And the first thing they expect to string-forth from Obama's pen and/or telephone would be a spiking of the minimum wage (for federal/fed contract employees) from $7.25 to $10.10... forty percent, hey, why not- he's just spreading the wealth around. It's like Christmas Festivus morning, waiting for Obama to march in and take over completely... Reaganite Republican ^ \| 30 January 2014

To: longnshort who wrote (766991)	1/30/2014 1:12:27 PM
From: joseffy	1 Recommendation Recommended By longnshort Respond to of 1577883

To: longnshort who wrote (766991)	1/30/2014 1:15:19 PM
From: joseffy	Respond to of 1577883

Noted constitutional scholar Sheila Jackson Lee: "Executive orders are legal" because he's just trying to help and protect us, "acting ‘on behalf of the American people"

To: longnshort who wrote (766991)	1/30/2014 1:15:40 PM
From: joseffy	Respond to of 1577883

MSNBC's Ed Schultz: "Obama Is exactly right to take action without Congress..." Of course! And the first thing they expect to string-forth from Obama's pen and/or telephone would be a spiking of the minimum wage (for federal/fed contract employees) from $7.25 to $10.10... forty percent, hey, why not- he's just spreading the wealth around.