Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mark silvers who wrote (6978)	12/11/1997 9:30:00 AM
From: Tom Frederick	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

Mark, there is not enough time or space to express all the things I am thinking and feeling right now. Most important, thank you for your pep talks and gab sessions to keep us in focus on the goal here. There are many things yet to happen but this removes all shadow of doubt about what Naxos has been claiming for over 7 years now. It's going to be a great day and an even greater year for Naxos and its shareholders! Regards to all Tom F.

To: mark silvers who wrote (6978)	12/11/1997 9:34:00 AM
From: Henry Volquardsen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

I was wondering about scale up. Are you referring to the Sep 2 release? That was a 200 lb bulk test (close enough). The numbers were 3.135 gold equivalent (still very, very good) .779 gold, 1.259 platinum and 1.378 palladium. This sample was taken from surface material so there may have been factors that would give it a different concentration than material from a 135 foot depth. But if it is of similar quality to the deeper material it would indicate a lower yield on scale up for commercial production. Don't get me wrong, 3 oz gold equivalent is still excellent and will make us all very happy. It will be interesting to see what happens with the production assay.