Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (47157)	1/31/2014 4:23:58 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie	3 Recommendations Recommended By Bob Brumar89 FJB Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 86363

no, actually, the liberal thing is to stop water distribution in the most productive agricultural land in the nation to save a local variation of a very common fish. You can't deny that there are powerful liberal movements to stop water distribution to the agricultural areas of the Central & Imperial Valleys of California. Liberals want to ban coal. Liberals are suing phosphate miners to shut down the mines Liberals are foaming at the mouth trying to end the use of GMOs As far as oil goes, has there ever been a time when liberals weren't bitching about oil? And you simply don't even have a clue as to the ramifications if you were successful I'd like to hear what you think the U.S. would look like in 1 year if we successfully banned coal today. What would the U.S. look like in 2 years with no phosphate mining? Now let's ban GMOs altogether. What does this country look like in two years with no coal, no phosphates and no GMOs?