SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : How Quickly Can Obama Totally Destroy the US? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: longnshort who wrote (7657)2/1/2014 5:31:18 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
PROOF Obama Is A Member Of The Muslim Brotherhood


January 23, 2014 by Kris Zane 64 Comments


Barack Obama has gorged his administration with Muslim Brotherhood members.

Obama openly backed the Muslim Brotherhood regime in Egypt.
And Obama’s minions are plotting their return to power.

The Muslim Brotherhood front group, Council on American Islamic Relations—found to have funneled millions of dollars to the terrorist group Hamas— have met with White House officials hundreds of times.

The most pernicious act, however, of this Quran-toting President, Barack Hussein Obama—revealed in a classified State Department memo this week—is that Muslim Brotherhood members are regularly given VIP treatment at airports, not being subject to the TSA’s unconstitutional searches. No body scanners, no invasive searches, no Muslim Brotherhood members’ children having TSA agents stick their hands down their pants. Their treatment has been likened to that given to Saudi royalty!

Americans are Obama’s enemy. The Muslim Brotherhood are his allies. And the incontrovertible fact, as proclaimed widely throughout Egypt and screamed out in front page newspaper headlines, is that “Barack Hussein Obama is a member of the Muslim Brotherhood!”

Read more at westernjournalism.com

credit monkryman



To: longnshort who wrote (7657)2/1/2014 5:34:13 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
Obama Family Discovered to be Part of Secret Muslim Terror Operation

by Shoebat Foundation on February 1, 2014
By Walid Shoebat

The Obama family’s legacy – although most today would not even consider saying it – will one day be etched in history books under the heading, “How a family of terrorists fooled America”. They have promoted Wahhabist interests in Saudi Arabia and were the greatest supporters of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt.

Sayyid Obama, Barack Obama, and Malik Obama.

And now more damning evidence reveals the Hamas financing connections of President Obama’s brother, Malik Obama, adding further to what we previously disclosed. The Islamic Dawa Organization (IDO) Malik Obama helps lead as Executive Director, is a member organization of “The Union of Good” (UG), which the U.S. Treasury designated as “Terrorist”.

The official website for UG still shows the IDO of Malik and his boss Suar al-Dhahab as being an official member organization in the coalition. UG is an umbrella organization that represents over 50 Islamic fundraising groups worldwide and was designated by the U.S. Department of Treasury as a terrorist entity under Executive Order 13224:

NAME OF ENTITY ADDED ON 11-12-08
UNION OF GOOD (a.k.a. 101 DAYS CAMPAIGN; a.k.a. CHARITY COALITION; a.k.a. COALITION OF GOOD; a.k.a. ETELAF AL-KHAIR; a.k.a. ETILAFU EL-KHAIR; a.k.a. I’TILAF AL-KHAIR; a.k.a. I’TILAF AL-KHAYR), P.O. Box 136301, Jeddah 21313, Saudi Arabia

This authorizes the U.S. government to block the assets of organizations and individuals that provide financial support to terrorist organizations. According to the U.S. Department of Treasury,Hamas leadership founded the UG in 2000 shortly after the inception of the second Intifada with the purpose of facilitating the transfer of funds to Hamas.

But how could this happen if his brother is U.S. President?

Now for the damning evidence. According to the UG website’s home page, the two main photos of its two greatest leaders are #1 president of its organization Yusuf al-Qaradawi (the unwavering supporter for Hezbollah, Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad) and the #2 man is none other than Suar al-Dhahab, Malik Obama’s direct boss.

Yusuf al-Qaradawi and Suar al-Dahab on Union of Good Homepage.

AKAs: Charity Coalition?, Coalition of Good ?I’tilaf Al-Khair ?I’tilaf Al-Khayr? 101 Days Campaign, ?Etelaf Al-Khair” (see Dept of Treasury)

Malik Obama and his IDO boss, Suar al-Dahab.

On the Trustees list, Yusuf al-Qaradawi is also listed as #1 President and Suar al-Dhahab is #2 as vice-president (if you use Google translate here, you’re likely to see al-Dahab’s name translated into English as ‘gold bracelet’ due to Arabic names having specific meanings).

Qaradawi and al-Dahab: #1 and #2 on UG Trustees list.

On UG’s Contributing Institutions page, one of the partners listed is Malik Obama’s IDO:

Malik Obama’s IDO listed as UG Contributor.

Islamic Dawa Organization (aka Islamic Dawa Association)*

*Note: The U.S., Wikileaks and Israel err by calling it “Association” when it should be “organization” (Munazamat). The Arabic is correct (Munazzamatal-Da’waal-Islamiia) from the U.S. but the Arabic is incorrect from Israel (Munazzamat Al-Dawa Al Islamic). It should read “Munazamat Al-Dawa Al Islamia”.

The website even provides the method to donate that includes all the affiliated organizations, even Malik’s IDO, with contact information to send the contributions for Hamas:



While IDO funded Hamas throughout the years, it still does and is still part of the coalition of the UG (Union of Good). Again, the U.S. Treasury Department has designated the Union of Good – a worldwide collection of charities headed by global Muslim Brotherhood leader Yusuf al-Qaradawi – as a terrorist entity as a result of its fund-raising activities on behalf of Hamas. This designation is also in Israel. (see #19 and also here)

The IRS granted a terror funding outfit the ability to operate under a 501(c)(3) and the worst part is we’re talking about the brother of the U.S. President. Everything we reported adds up; the Obama family, to include Grandmother Mama Sarah, Uncle Sayid Obama, Cousin Musa Ismail Obamaand now Malik Obama, is part of a clandestine team that funds terrorism. Some questioned the links we provided, complaining that we only provided limited websites of Malik’s IDO. The fact is, there is a plethora of forums and religious websites (some very prominent). There are also universities and even sports clubs raising funds for Hamas and asking donors to send the money to the Sudan’s IDO. To show the volume of websites, we included but a few below.

Lois Lerner: Signature at bottom of Malik Obama’s tax-exempt approval letter.

I rest my case regarding this wretched family.

Walid Shoebat

IDO donations linked to Hamas:
Star Times: startimes.com
Islamweb, perhaps the most prominent: islamweb.net
Muslim.org is a major Muslim website: muslm.org
akhawat.islamway.net

almualem.net
nafithat.com
aoua.com
arabiyat.com
dewanalarab.com

Koora (Forum): forum.kooora.com
alwadi.com.sa
yemen-sound.com
ahsaweb.net

Almuslim (Forum): almuslem.com (this one says, “donate for Palestine” on 12/9/09)
tihama-yemen.com
jazan4u.com (called by Yusuf al-Qaradawi in 2006)
cksu.com (King Saud University)

Be my guest and use Google Translate.

Here are a few more links for those who need more information:

arabiyat.com
arabiyat.com
arabiyat.com
arabiyat.com
arabiyat.com
ittihadfans.com
ittihadfans.com
ittihadfans.com
ittihadfans.com
ittihadfans.com
ittihadfans.com
ittihadfans.com
ittihadfans.com
ittihadfans.com
ittihadfans.com
ittihadfans.com
ittihadfans.com
ittihadfans.com
ittihadfans.com
ittihadfans.com
ittihadfans.com
ittihadfans.com
ittihadfans.com
ittihadfans.com
ittihadfans.com
ittihadfans.com
ittihadfans.com
ittihadfans.com
ittihadfans.com
ittihadfans.com
ittihadfans.com
ittihadfans.com
ittihadfans.com
ittihadfans.com
ittihadfans.com
ittihadfans.com
ittihadfans.com
ittihadfans.com
ittihadfans.com
ittihadfans.com
ittihadfans.com
ittihadfans.com

credit monkeyman



To: longnshort who wrote (7657)2/1/2014 6:23:33 PM
From: joseffy2 Recommendations

Recommended By
R2O
Shoot1st

  Respond to of 16547
 



To: longnshort who wrote (7657)2/1/2014 11:12:22 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
Muslims taking over Belgium

cbn.com



To: longnshort who wrote (7657)2/2/2014 12:35:19 AM
From: joseffy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 16547
 
NYT Caught Altering Christie Story: Port Authority Official No Longer 'Has Evidence,


NewsBusters.org ^
| February 1, 2014 | Tom Blumer


Longtime readers here may recall that yours truly and others have written about liberties New York Times reporter Kate Zernike has taken with the truth, especially in her reporting on the Tea Party movement.

Her penchant for inventing baseless stories about alleged racism in the movement once caused the late Andrew Breitbart to label her "a despicable human being."

Breitbart might well have the same reaction to the hours-later revision made at Zernike's Times story Friday about Chris Christie. Several alert bloggers and tweeters noted that her story about Christie's knowledge of shut lanes on the George Washington Bridge conveniently went from solid to speculative without any indication that any changes had been made. Here's how it originally appeared, as seen in the results of a Google search on [Christie "he has evidence"] (typed exactly as indicated between brackets) and the following tweet from Time Swampland blogger Michael Scherer (HT Twitchy):



Here are the current headline and first two paragraphs at Zernike's story:



Kate Zernike is smart enough to know that there's a world of difference between "he has evidence" and "(apparently unpossessed and unseen) evidence exists." So why did she run with "he has evidence" for at least several hours? And why doesn't she and/or the Times have the integrity to tell us about the change?

The "correction" added sometime this morning appears to be unrelated to the nature of the "evidence."

Swampland's Scherer capsulized the likely motivation, but downplayed the significance of the change, and proceeded to misplace the blame:



"Clumsy"? How about "misleading, and likely deliberately so"?


Drudge didn't wrote the story, Michael. If Drudge made a mistake, perhaps it was in trusting anything originating with Kate Zernike in the first place.

Perhaps Zernike knew that a deliberately exaggerated story on a Friday afternoon might cause Drudge to bite, and would plant the impression in the minds of many that Christie has been caught dead to rights. Though he may ultimately be, the Times walkback indicates that it hasn't happened yet.

But Zernike and the Times have "successfully" made that impression widespread. Mission accomplished, I suppose — if your goal is to deceive and destroy regardless of merit.



To: longnshort who wrote (7657)2/2/2014 12:45:11 AM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
Bill de Blasio Returns to the Airwaves With Al Sharpton

Saturday, February 01, 2014 11:54:50 PM · by Tailgunner Joe · 5 replies
politicker.com ^ | January 30, 2014 | Ross Barkan





To: longnshort who wrote (7657)2/2/2014 12:47:07 AM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
McCain Happy that House is Pushing Amnesty

Saturday, February 01, 2014 11:41:36 PM · by Tolerance Sucks Rocks · 11 replies
The Loft (GOPUSA) ^ | February 1, 2014 | Bobby Eberle





To: longnshort who wrote (7657)2/2/2014 2:01:15 AM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
Dinesh D’Souza’s Indictment and Double Standards

………………………………………………………………………….
Frontpage Mag ^ | 02/01/2014 | Matthew Vadum

The Obama administration’s indictment of critic Dinesh D’Souza on campaign finance law violations is a reminder that it’s dangerous to be in the opposition when the president is a lawless strongman who knows the media will protect him no matter what.

Democratic malefactors remained at large on Friday as D’Souza pleaded not guilty to charges that he directed two individuals to each make $10,000 donations to the campaign of Wendy Long, an unsuccessful Republican candidate for the U.S. Senate, on the understanding he would reimburse them, which he did not long after.

The court in New York reportedly imposed unusually tough release conditions on the bestselling conservative author, ordering him to post a $500,000 bond and not to leave the country.

D’Souza’s attorney told U.S. District Judge Richard M. Berman that the facts were more or less not in dispute. “I think there’s a dispute over how it happened and whether what happened violated federal law,” Benjamin Brafman said.

As The Blaze reports,

Outside court, Brafman said there was no corrupt intent, a necessary component of the law, in his client’s actions, and he said the $20,000 in donations fell short of the $25,000 required to bring a criminal case. He said it was a situation that was normally resolved with a fine rather than criminal charges. He said there was no request by D’Souza that Long do anything, and the Senate candidate had no knowledge that campaign finance rules had been violated. Brafman said D’Souza and Long had been friends since college and “at worst, this was an act of misguided friendship by D’Souza.”

So why was D’Souza subjected to serial killer treatment, arrested, incarcerated, maybe perp-walked, for something that’s roughly the campaign finance law equivalent of a traffic ticket?

Could it be because D’Souza went too far in criticizing the notoriously thin-skinned Obama with his compelling, scathingly critical documentary, 2016: Obama’s America? The movie brought in an astounding $33 million in revenue, making it the second most popular political documentary in U.S. history behind Michael Moore’s lie-filled, anti-George W. Bush temper tantrum from 2004, Fahrenheit 9/11.

D’Souza is now arguably in trouble because Obama’s people promised retribution during the president’s second term. “After we win this election, it’s our turn. Payback time,” Valerie Jarrett, Obama’s close, trusted adviser, has been quoted saying in reference to the 2012 election. She warned:

“Everyone not with us is against us, and they better be ready because we don’t forget. The ones who helped us will be rewarded, the ones who opposed us will get what they deserve. There is going to be hell to pay.”

Some Obama apologists, incidentally, suggest the Jarrett quotation is apocryphal. They may be right. Even if it is made up, it doesn’t matter. Chicagoan Jarrett is every bit as devious and vindictive an Alinskyite as Obama is. Whether Jarrett used those exact words or not, the quotation exquisitely encapsulates the beliefs of Obama’s inner circle, whether it’s Rahm Emanuel or Hillary Clinton bragging about the opportunities for change that a crisis presents, or Anita Dunn praising Mao Zedong, or Justice Department nominee Debo Adegbile proclaiming the innocence of cop-killer Mumia Abu-Jamal. Jarrett and Obama’s other advisers clearly think these Machiavellian thoughts every day.

Obama himself does not forgive and he does not forget. Obama threatened Congressman Peter DeFazio (D-Ore.) during a meeting of the House Democratic Caucus soon after his first inauguration. “Don’t think we’re not keeping score, brother,” Obama said in an effort to keep DeFazio, himself a radical leftist, in line.

An old associate of Obama and Bill Ayers from Chicago, Mike Klonsky, wrote a blog post on Jan. 24 suggesting he has special inside knowledge about why D’Souza was indicted.

“Note to Dinesh D’Souza — You probably shouldn’t have Tweeted that racist remark about Obama and Trayvon Martin. Shit like that sometimes comes back to haunt you.”

What was this “racist” remark exactly? Two days before Thanksgiving, D’Souza wrote on Twitter, “I am thankful this week when I remember that America is big enough and great enough to survive Grown-Up Trayvon in the White House!”

Given that Obama famously likened himself to Trayvon Martin, it’s difficult for rational people to understand what the fuss is all about. D’Souza merely threw Obama’s own words back at him. The tweet may be biting or mordant but there is nothing even remotely racist about it.

Whiny Jonathan Capehart of the Washington Post was typical of the leftist lynch mob as he condemned the tweet as “vile” and having “racist implications” but didn’t bother explaining what exactly those racist implications were. Among today’s radical left-wingers, racism is in the eye of the beholder, and if you can’t see it for yourself, then presumably you’re part of the problem.

Republican D’Souza may be feeling the fury of an angry Democratic president, but there are plenty of Democrats who have escaped investigation/prosecution for the wrongdoings attributed to them.

Here are just a few of such individuals:

1) Eric Holder.

Purveyor of unequal justice for all.

Obama’s attorney general is so contemptuous of the rule of law and the constitutionally-prescribed oversight authority of Congress that the House of Representatives –including almost two dozen Democratic lawmakers– voted to find him in contempt of Congress on June 28, 2012. A hateful man who rhetorically spits on conservatives, Holder is a law enforcement chief who has made it clear he considers it his job only to protect the rights of minorities and left-wingers. If you’re not on his side or your skin is the wrong color, don’t even think about getting justice from his Justice Department.

As New York Times bestselling author of Injustice, J. Christian Adams, writes

“The havoc Holder has created goes far beyond corruption on any single issue. The damage he has done crosses all components of the Department of Justice, and has trickled down to infect the systems of law and legal jurisprudence throughout the country. He has tried to transform the federal agency intended to be above politics into an institution advocating radical change and extreme remedies.”

The litany of prosecutorial abuses and selective prosecutions under Holder grows. There is the DoJ’s refusal to take up cases involving alleged civil rights victims when the victim is white. There is also: the crackdown on Gibson Guitars; the overzealous, possibly malicious, prosecution of investigative journalist James O’Keefe III; using federal resources to agitate for a state-level prosecution of George Zimmerman based on trumped up charges; using federal resources to help anarchists and activists from the violent Occupy Wall Street movement agitate at the Republican National Convention in 2012; the DoJ vendetta against Fox News and reporter James Rosen; and the DoJ’s flagrant manipulation of the 2012 election.

Holder also spearheaded an attack on the Second Amendment and lied to Congress about it. He flooded the U.S. border with Mexico with illicit firearms, leading to the deaths of a U.S. border patrol officer and many Mexican nationals.

2) Maxine Waters.

Race hustler and corrupt-o-crat.

Few politicians combine ignorance, obstinate self-righteousness, racial demagoguery, and extremism quite as perfectly as the congresswoman from South Central who has become a major force shaping federal banking policy. Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.), a longtime cheerleader for Fidel Castro, was only too happy to use the 1992 Los Angeles riots as a political advertisement. She viewed the 53 deaths, thousands of injuries, and $1 billion in property damage as a shining example of participatory democracy. The word riot never escaped her lips. She called the unrest a “rebellion” and “a spontaneous reaction to a lot of injustice and a lot of alienation and frustration.”

“She is one of the most self-serving, hate-filled, race-obsessed politicians in America,” says columnist Michelle Malkin. “The Democratic Party doesn’t just embrace her. It kneels at her feet.”

A few years ago Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics (CREW) named Waters as one of the 13 “most corrupt” members of the U.S. Congress. CREW cited a Los Angeles Times investigation disclosing how a number of Waters’s relatives had made more than $1 million during the preceding eight years by doing business with companies, candidates, and causes that Waters had assisted. The lawmaker has had frequent run-ins with House ethics authorities.

3) Harry Reid.

Senate Majority Leader and rich guy.

For someone with a relatively clean reputation among the press, Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nev.) certainly has been involved in a lot of shady deals. Reid has allegedly illegally accepted gifts, commingled personal and campaign funds, and made a handsome profit a decade ago on a questionable land deal. He misreported the transaction on congressional disclosure forms and stonewalled when pressed for details.

Between 2001 and 2004, Reid, in apparent violation of Senate ethics provisions, wrote at least four letters pressing the Bush administration to take action on issues important to Indian tribes that were clients of the notoriously corrupt lobbyist Jack Abramoff. CBS News reports that “starting in the mid-1990s, he [Abramoff] became a master at showering gifts on lawmakers in return for their votes on legislation and tax breaks favorable to his clients.” Eventually Abramoff was convicted in federal court of corrupting public officials, tax evasion, and fraud, and he served three-and-a-half years in prison.

During the 2001-04 period, Abramoff’s staff was in regular contact with Reid’s office. Whenever Reid wrote a letter on behalf of the Indian tribes, he reportedly collected donations from Abramoff’s lobbying partners and clients around the same time period. These donations totaled nearly $68,000, yet the Abramoff affair has been labeled a “Republican” scandal.

In August 2012, the Las Vegas Review-Journal reported that Reid was strong-arming NV Energy, Nevada’s primary electricity provider, to purchase more “green energy” from a Chinese solar company named ENN Mojave Energy LLC. This happened even though NV Energy had already exceeded its state-mandated quota for green energy (which generated higher electric bills for customers). “There’s another factor, however,” noted the newspaper, “one more personal to Reid: His son, Rory Reid, is one of the attorneys for the ENN Mojave Energy project…. [S]uccess for ENN in finding customers helps Rory Reid, and its failure could cost him a client.”

4) Lois Lerner.

Tax bureaucrat from Hell.

Former Obama IRS Exempt Organizations Division Director Lois Lerner remains at large after (improperly) taking the Fifth Amendment at congressional hearings. Lerner earned her place in infamy when she presided over her IRS division’s targeting of conservative and Tea Party groups. Right-of-center nonprofit groups were subjected to extra scrutiny under Lerner and their applications for tax-exempt status were routinely delayed. Lerner engaged in similar shenanigans when she ran the Enforcement Division of the Federal Election Commission (FEC).

5) Wade Rathke.

Shakedown artist and coverup expert.

Eric Holder’s Justice Department has not investigated the man who founded the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) in 1970 and ran it into the ground until its board fired him in 2008. Wade Rathke orchestrated a massive internal coverup after his brother Dale Rathke embezzled close to $1 million from ACORN around 2000. Some of the money was taken from ACORN employees’ pension funds.

Before it filed for bankruptcy on Election Day 2010, ACORN was an essential part of the Democratic Party’s voter fraud apparatus for decades so it’s not surprising that Rathke got off scot-free. Rathke has even been rewarded by the Obama administration. United Labor Unions (ULU) Local 100 in New Orleans, which Rathke heads, has received federal funding to enroll people in Obamacare exchanges.

6) David Brock.

Character assassin, gun-toting hypocrite, and Obama publicist.

Media Matters for America (MMfA) founder and George Soros lieutenant David Brock is an admitted liar who claims that Hillary Clinton’s enemies invented the Benghazi scandal to undermine her presidential run. But it’s not illegal to be a pathologically mendacious sleaze or to slither around on the same moral plane as a 9/11 truther conspiracy theorist.

Although MMfA constantly advocates for tougher gun laws, like many wealthy left-wingers, Brock doesn’t believe that gun laws apply to him. The Daily Caller reported that he told friends and co-workers that right-wing assassins were trying to kill him. Brock’s personal assistant reportedly carried a concealed Glock handgun around the District of Columbia, where it is illegal to do so, in order to protect Brock.

Because Brock is a friend of the Obama administration, no action has been taken against him. (Presumably if charges were to be pursued against Brock it would be done by the local government for the District of Columbia but it’s not as if the Obama administration has no pull with that Democrat-controlled local government.)

It is also not illegal to operate political propaganda machinery while suffering from serious mental illness though one has to question why donors would keep funding an organization run by such an unstable individual.

—-

Will any of these shady Democrats be investigated or prosecuted during the balance of President Obama’s term in office?

Don’t count on it.



To: longnshort who wrote (7657)2/2/2014 4:05:42 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
Obama Tweets Pic of Himself Throwing Football on Super Bowl Sunday

On Sunday, President Obama celebrated the Super Bowl by having the White House tweet a picture of him throwing a football.


2.2.2014
truthrevolt.org


On Sunday, President Obama celebrated the Super Bowl by having the White House tweet a picture of him throwing a football:

President Obama said two weeks ago that he would not let his son, if he existed, play football: “I would not let my son play pro football.”

Obama has also criticized the violence of the game, stating, “I’m a big football fan, but I have to tell you, if I had a son, I’d have to think long and hard before I let him play football.” He then said that football was like smoking: “At this point, there’s a little bit of caveat emptor. These guys, they know what they’re doing. They know what they’re buying into. It is no longer a secret. It’s sort of the feeling I have about smokers, you know.”



To: longnshort who wrote (7657)2/5/2014 7:32:36 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
Sotomayor: Labeling Illegal Immigrants Criminals Is Insulting

.....................................................................................
CBS DC ^ | February 4, 2014 5:53 AM





To: longnshort who wrote (7657)2/6/2014 11:00:15 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
THREE GREAT AMERICANS




To: longnshort who wrote (7657)2/7/2014 4:06:09 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
Rep. Elijah Cummings Lied to Brian Terry's Family
.......................................................................
By Shoebat Foundation February 7, 2014
shoebat.com

Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD) looked the Brian Terry family in the eye and assured them justice; he lied to a grieving family. Upon his expression of sincerity, he ran interference for the Obama administration. He’s done the same thing to the families of the Benghazi attack victims.




Elijah Cummings: Despicable human being.

Now it’s been learned that Cummings has run interference for Lois Lerner and, by extension, Malik Obama while simultaneously intimidating a law-abiding citizen who happens to be a conservative.

If you can stomach Obama administration apparatchik Juan Williams asserting that there is no evidence of the IRS targeting conservative groups while calling Lois Lerner an ‘expert’, stick with the video below. When George Will begins speaking toward the end, he calls for granting Lerner immunity and compelling her to testify.

Shortly thereafter, Wallace asks Charles Krauthammer why the Republican majority in the House isn’t pushing harder to get to the bottom of this scandal. Krauthammer seems vexed by it as well (sorry for the auto start; it drives us crazy too but can’t disable it).

Here’s the exchange, via Daily Caller:

As to why House Republicans aren’t pushing harder, it’s an excellent question, Chris. We’ve been asking that very thing for quite some time. Rep. Mike Kelly (R-PA) once again provides the quintessential example. Since admitting that claims about Lerner granting illegal tax-exempt status to Malik Obama, who is connected to terrorism, are “spot on”, Kelly has been hiding under his desk, despite looking Tea Party leaders in the face and telling them, “we’ve got your backs” during a Congressional hearing.

It’s good that Will is asking for Lerner’s testimony through immunity but his focus is all wrong. He wants her to testify about why the IRS specifically targeted conservative groups. In reality, he should be demanding that Lerner be granted immunity to protect her against charges that she aided and abetted an enemy combatant who just so happens to be President Obama’s brother (see Mike Kelly above).

Here is our vast repository of Malik Obama articles.

Meanwhile, it was learned yesterday that Cummings, ranking member of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, personally targeted King Street Patriots and True the Vote founder Catherine Engelbrecht with three letters on Oversight Committee letterhead. Engelbrecht has since filed an ethics complaint against Cummings.

Conversely, Cummings has expressed no interest in getting to the bottom of Lerner’s criminal acts.

It cannot be overstated that Lerner granted Malik Obama – a man with ties to terrorism – 501(c)(3) status in less than 30 days and illegally backdated the approval 38 months while law-abiding citizens like Engelbrecht have been harassed by multiple federal agencies.

Lois Lerner: Accessory to Terror Funding

Granting Lois Lerner immunity is an excellent idea. Here is a list of questions we put together last May. She just needs to have some serious charges of being an accessory to terrorism dangled in front of her first.

Here is Engelbrecht on the Kelly File, shortly after filing that complaint (h/t GWP):




To: longnshort who wrote (7657)2/14/2014 9:47:11 AM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
Modern "Science" At Work
..................................................................................................................
Report: Under Armour suits may be contributing to American speedskating troubles


By Stanley KayFebruary 13, 2014
tracking.si.com]



New high-tech suits
designed by Under Armour specifically for the Olympics may be a factor in the U.S. speedskating team’s disappointing performances at the Olympics, according to a report in the Wall Street Journal.

Shani Davis was widely expected to contend for a gold medal in the men’s 1,000 meters, but he instead finished eighth in Wednesday’s contest. Meanwhile, no American woman medaled in the women’s 1,000. There have been six events through Thursday, and Americans have not finished higher than seventh place in any of them.

The new suits, designed specifically for these Olympics, are suspected of slowing down speedskaters through a glitch in design.


According to three people familiar with the U.S. team, these suits—which were designed by apparel sponsor Under Armour and billed before the Games as a major advantage—have a design flaw that may be slowing the skaters down.

These people said that vents on back of the suit, designed to allow heat to escape, are allowing air to enter the suit and create drag that keeps the skaters from staying in the “low” position they need to achieve maximum speed.

One skater said team members felt they were fighting the suit to maintain correct form.

Under Armour’s design for the suits came from an intricate analysis of speedskating science and dynamics. The result was the “Mach 39? suit, which promised to be the fastest suit ever.

The Baltimore-based apparel company partnered with advanced technology and defense firm Lockheed Martin to create a uniform that involves five different textiles, all of which have a different purpose, such as lessening friction. Overall, engineers of the suit wanted to focus on the aerodynamics of the entire body, first analyzing how air interacted with the body and using that data to develop a technologically advanced, physics-driven design.

Under Armour’s contract with U.S. speedskating is set to expire at the conclusion of the Sochi Games.



A gold medal favorite, Shani Davis has disappointed so far in Sochi. (Mark Reis/Colorado Springs Gazette/MCT)



To: longnshort who wrote (7657)2/17/2014 5:23:50 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
Kerry Generates 12 Tons of CO2 on Trip Discussing Climate Change


..................................................................................
National Review ^ | February 17, 2014 | Jim Geraghty




To: longnshort who wrote (7657)2/17/2014 8:01:54 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
On PBS, David Brooks Mocks Ted Cruz As 'Our National Aphrodisiac'

...........................................................................
newsbusters.org ^ | February 17, 2014




To: longnshort who wrote (7657)2/23/2014 12:23:10 AM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
Venezuelan president calls Kerry remarks "arrogant" and "insolent."

................................................................................................................

Caracas (AFP) - President Nicolas Maduro said Saturday that remarks by US Secretary of State John Kerry on the unrest in Venezuela gave violent groups a "green light" to carry out attacks.

In a tweet, Maduro also slammed the remarks made by Kerry late Friday as "arrogant" and "insolent."

"John Kerry threatens Venezuela with more violence, with his statements gives the green light to violent groups to attack our people," Maduro wrote.

news.yahoo.com



To: longnshort who wrote (7657)2/24/2014 11:40:01 AM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
John Dingelberry, longest serving U.S. representative, to retire
.........................................................................................................

February 24, 2014 By Todd Spangler, Stephen Henderson and Kathleen Gray Detroit Free Press Staff Writers
freep.com



John Dingell, from Dearborn, Michigan has the record for voting against Israel and for the muslim takeover of the US.


WASHINGTON — U.S. Rep. John Dingell, a Dearborn Democrat who replaced his father in the House some 58 years ago and became one of the most powerful members of Congress ever, will step down after this year, capping a career umatched in its longevity and singular in its influence and sweep.

Dingell, 87, told the Free Press that he’d reached the decision to retire at the end of his current term — his 29th full one — rather than run for re-electon because it was time, given a list of achievements that any other member of Congress would envy, and his continued frustration over partisan gridlock.

It comes at a time when many members of both parties are moving toward the exits in both the House and Senate. Michigan and metro Detroit are not only losing Dingell but U.S. Sen. Carl Levin, a widely respected Democrat with 35 years’ experience, who announced his retirement last year.

For weeks, rumors had circulated that Dingell — who last June surpassed the late U.S. Sen. Robert C. Byrd of West Virginia as the longest-serving member of Congress ever — might be considering retirement. While clearly sharp mentally — he could be seen in recent months peppering witnesses with questions before his beloved Energy and Commerce Committee — time has taken its toll on his body, forcing him to use crutches or a wheelchair to get around.

But less than two weeks ago, his office seemed to put those rumors to rest with an e-mail to constituents in which Dingell vowed to fight on for extended unemployment benefits and “to protect the many workers and industries important to southeast Michigan.” In the e-mail, he said he would “continue to reiterate to my colleagues that the words ‘compromise’ and ‘conciliation’ should not be considered dirty words in Washington.”Dingell was expected to let his staff know about the decision this morning and then announce it publicly at a noon luncheon at the Southern Wayne County Chamber of Commerce in Southgate. Speculation will begin almost immediately about a successor.

Dingell’s wife, Deborah, who with her husband makes up one of Washington’s and southeastern Michigan’s most prominent power couples, is widely considered a possible candidate; there has also been speculation that state Sen. Rebekah Warren of Ann Arbor could test the waters. It is considered a relatively safe Democratic district stretching from Dearborn west and Downriver.

Whoever replaces Dingell, she or he will have a tough act to follow.

John David Dingell Jr. was 29 years old when the Detroit native was elected in a 1955 special election to serve out the remainder of his late father’s term. Since then, he has cast tens of thousands of votes and helped pass — if not write — the most iconic pieces of legislation of the last six decades, from the Civil Rights Act and Medicare to the Clean Water Act, the Clean Air Act, the Endangered Species Act and, in 2010, the Affordable Care Act.

The man known throughout Washington as Big John — at 6-foot-3, he literally towered over witnesses before the House Energy and Commerce Committee — Dingell cut a distinctive figure in the Capitol. A progressive when it came to workers’ rights, he is also a staunch defender of Michigan industries, including its automakers, and at times ran afoul of environmentalists.

He also supported gun rights, and, as an avid outdoorsman, sat on the board of the National Rifle Association for a time, though he eventually quit. He counts as among his most important accomplishments the creation of the Detroit International Wildlife Refuge and the River Raisin Battlefield.

Gentlemanly and erudite, Dingell has always positioned himself as a centrist when it comes to getting legislation passed, looking for members on both sides of the political aisle to count on as allies. Dingell has decried the partisan atmosphere that has grown toxic in Washington, but he has managed to maintain friendships across the aisle, including with the current Energy and Commerce Committee chairman, U.S. Rep. Fred Upton of St. Joseph.Dingell still likes referring to himself as “just a dumb Polish lawyer,” but his career has helped shape the way legislation is passed in Washington. He vastly expanded the scope of the Energy and Commerce Committee’s purview during his first stint as chairman, which lasted from 1981 to 1995, to the point where it was said it handled four out of every 10 bills in the House.

He used to have a photo of the earth from space behind his desk and when anyone asked him to define the committee’s jurisdiction, he’d point to it.

Dingell also became famous — or infamous, as the case may have been — among Washington bureaucrats, industrialists and others who came before his committees for oversight matters. He investigated the Environmental Protection Agency, the Food and Drug Administation and oversaw the breakup of AT&T, and his letters to agency officials — demanding specific answers to questions in a tight timeframe — grew legendary as “Dingell-grams.”

Many felt Dingell might resign sometime after the 2008 election when, fresh off a knee surgery, U.S. Rep. Henry Waxman of California — a key ally of then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi — took on Dingell for the Energy and Commerce chairmanship and won. But Dingell continued to work with Waxman to pass the ACA and has remained chairman emeritus and sat on all subcommittees.

Waxman, who had remained the ranking Democrat on the commitee after Republicans took control of the House in 2011, announced his retirement from Congress in the last few weeks as well. With Waxman stepping down, there had been some speculation that Dingell might again ask his party to return him to the ranking member’s seat.

With Dingell’s departure at the end of the current term in early January, the longest-serving active member of Congress will be another Michigander, U.S. Rep. John Conyers, D-Detroit, who once worked for Dingell and has been in the House since 1965.

Conyers, 84, would need 10 more years to match Dingell’s record for longevity.

Last June, at a fete in the Capitol for Dingell surpassing Byrd’s mark, Republican House Speaker John Boehner choked up as he described his friendship with Dingell.

He said Dingell’s “milestone comes with all kinds of markers ... but you can’t really put a number on what it means to enjoy the admiration and respect of your peers.”





To: longnshort who wrote (7657)2/28/2014 7:50:45 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
Ignoring Terror Threats A Pattern With The Clintons

.................................................................................
Investors.com ^ | February 28, 2014 | IBD Editorial

Court papers reveal the FBI had an informant right next to Osama bin Laden in 1993 sending reports up the chain of command. Yet then-President Clinton did nothing — a pattern with both him and his wife. It came to light during a 2010 employment discrimination case filed by FBI agent Bassem Youssef, a Coptic Christian who contended he'd been passed over for promotion after directing an agent he recruited after the 1993 terror attack on the World Trade Center.

The still-unnamed agent provided valuable intelligence to the bureau on that 1993 case, and went on to reveal the terror ring's ties to an even more malevolent terrorist by the name of Osama bin Laden, the Washington Times reported.

The informant eventually went overseas to work as bin Laden's driver and eventually worked with the CIA until he was killed in Bosnia by suspicious Islamic terrorists in the mid-1990s.

The discrimination case, which Youssef won, highlights an important reality: that intelligence was developed and passed on to federal policymakers about the scope of bin Laden's nascent network and intentions as early as 1993.

That would have been during Clinton's presidency, signaling a failure of leadership that brings to three the number of lost opportunities to take out bin Laden before he could strike in 2001.

After Clinton ignored this information — and the FBI he led ignored the agent's contributions and denied him a promotion, in addition to "forgetting" to mention it all to the 9/11 commission — Clinton went on to ignore even clearer opportunities to take bin Laden out as a threat, focusing instead on domestic politics and the great health care battle in the era of "irrational exuberance."

In 1996, the Sudanese government offered to arrest and execute bin Laden, rather than let him escape to Afghanistan, a failed state where he could set up a base.

Clinton told them no.

Then in 2012, a top CIA counterterror official, Hank Crumpton, told CBS's 60 Minutes that in 1999, the CIA had bin Laden in its sights in Afghanistan, where his convoy had been identified. Drones showed clear images of his face. But Clinton refused that chance to act, too.

"The optics were spot-in, it was beaming back to us, CIA headquarters," Crumpton told CBS. "We immediately alerted the White House, and the Clinton administration's response was 'Well, it will take several hours for the TLAMs, the cruise missiles launched from submarines, to reach that objective. So you need to tell us where bin Laden will be five or six hours from now."

And scroll forward to 2012, when terrified diplomats warned of needing security against bin Laden's organization at the U.S. consulate in Benghazi. Then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton ignored their pleas.

They were massacred and dragged through the streets by cellphone-photo-snapping terrorists in yet another 9/11 terror attack. Secretary Clinton and her boss, President Obama, had the temerity to cover it up by claiming it was just the spontaneous act of a Muslim mob enraged over an obscure YouTube video.

President Clinton, meanwhile, claimed in an interview in the New Yorker that he paid far more attention to the emerging bin Laden network than his successor, President Bush, ever did.

Maybe so, because the information was emerging during his tenure. But as with the Benghazi case, he also made the decision to ignore the intelligence — and then blame Bush for the mayhem that followed.

It's a dereliction of duty that ought to be enough to hold the Clintons accountable for repeatedly failing to act when they should have.

Instead, they shamelessly move on, with Hillary Clinton now possibly angling for a new shot at power in the White House. At this point, it is beginning to sound like a plan that could get us killed.

Read More At Investor's Business Daily: news.investors.com



To: longnshort who wrote (7657)2/28/2014 8:34:20 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
Stumbling into an ethnic quagmire in Ukraine
................................................................................................
Jackson Doughart, National Post | February 27, 2014
fullcomment.nationalpost.com


The argument over foreign intervention has become so radically simplified, so founded on theories and principles and ignorant of facts, that it has lost all grasp of reality.
There is no better example of this than the present calamity in Ukraine, where Western internationalists have juxtaposed their narrow conceptions of liberal democracy and human rights onto a conflict that has little to do with either.

What’s really at stake here is a long history of ethnic division. Yet few commentators on the issue mention that Ukraine is not solely populated by Ukrainian nationals. The eastern and southern regions are populated by ethnic Russians, who speak Russian, identify with their co-ethnics in the motherland to the east, and are Orthodox Christians by confession. The ethnic Ukrainians, in contrast, speak the Ukrainian language, identify as a distinct nationality, and adhere mostly to Ukrainian Catholicism, a form of Christianity which observes the rite of Greek Orthodoxy while maintaining full communion with the Holy See.

Western observers frequently propound a moral distinction between the pro-Europe sympathies of the ethnic Ukrainians and the desire of the ethnic Russians to join a more definite Russian sphere, with greater influence for the government of Vladimir Putin. But this moral distinction is practically moot: the question of West-East economic orientation is the result of the ethnic cleavages, not the cause thereof.

What’s really happening today, as a rerun of the Orange Revolution of 2004-2005, is a clash of ethnic nationalisms, not a pursuit of democracy over tyranny. The Ukrainians want to maintain control over the entire state to preserve its territorial integrity, to claim the resources of the east, and to ensure that their co-ethnics in the Russian areas remain under their sovereignty. Of course, this is a legitimate ambition, but it has nothing to do with liberalism or human rights.

Accordingly, the ethnic Ukrainians have pushed language policies akin to those pursued by nationalists in Belarus and Estonia (both former Soviet Republics with Russian minorities), and not dissimilar to the efforts of the Quebec government in the 1970s here in Canada. Such policies cement the titular nation’s language as officially superior for the whole territory and manipulate education policies to promote its interests.

Just last weekend, the law recognizing Russian as a “regional language” in eastern courts was abolished, making Ukrainian the sole official language for the entire country. Under such circumstances, who could blame the ethnic Russians for seeking the protection and influence of the neighbouring super state?

The most laughable assumption about Ukraine is that the protestors are acting democratically

Western liberals have also admonished the ideology of the Russians to justify their blanket support for the ethnic Ukrainians (or “the Ukrainian people”, as they would say). For instance, the Yale historian Timothy Snyder, writing in the New York Review of Books, believes that Putin’s meddling in Ukraine reflects his desire to form a Eurasian Union, a Russian-dominated counterweight to the European Union that would be animated by “National Bolshevism”, an intellectual movement re-synthesizing nationalism and socialism.

Whatever the merits of Snyder’s analysis, the projection of anti-fascism onto this conflict is incorrect, especially given the equally sordid elements on the ethnic Ukrainian side. The All-Ukrainian Union Svoboda, an ultra-nationalist party, holds 8% of the seats in the parliament for the entire country, and thus represents a much larger minority among the ethnic Ukrainians. The party’s stronghold is the western city of L’viv, which is home to numerous monuments to Stepan Bandera, the leader of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists during the Second World War, a Nazi collaborator, and a participant in the mass murder of Ukrainian Jews.

The Svoboda claims descent from Bandera, and just last month held a march in his honour. The party’s leader, Oleh Tyahnybok, has announced in the Ukrainian parliament that the country is secretly controlled by a Jewish mafia.

Perhaps the most laughably wrong assumption, however, is that the protestors are acting democratically. Though certainly no choir boy, Mr. Yanukovych came to power in an election that was judged by international observers as free and fair, giving him the mandate to pursue his economic and trade policies. From exile, he is more than right to characterize his deposition as a coup d’état. This isn’t democracy; it is mob rule.

The actions of the Ukrainian protestors came to the present heights in part, though certainly not in whole, because of encouragement from the West
. In consequence, democratic order in an ethnically-fractious country has been overturned, perhaps permanently, and certainly beyond the ephemeral enthusiasms of the revolution’s Western cheerleaders.

National Post



To: longnshort who wrote (7657)3/1/2014 3:19:53 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
Documents show 1990s effort to 'humanize' Hillary Clinton

.......................................................................................................
Reuters ^ | 1 Mar 2014 | JOHN WHITESIDES AND WILL DUNHAM




To: longnshort who wrote (7657)3/1/2014 4:18:22 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
Russia might invade Ukraine if Obama wins, Palin warns in 2008
.................................................................................................................
  • BY Blake Hounshell OCTOBER 22, 2008


  • Speaking Tuesday at a rally in a Reno, Nevada, Republican vice-presidential nominee Sarah Palin had a little fun with her counterpart on the Democratic ticket, thanking Joe Biden for warning Barack Obama's supporters to " gird your loins" for an international crisis if the Illinois senator wins.

    Palin helpfully offered four scenarios for such a crisis, one of which was this strange one:

    After the Russian Army invaded the nation of Georgia, Senator Obama's reaction was one of indecision and moral equivalence, the kind of response that would only encourage Russia's Putin to invade Ukraine next.



    As we've said before, this is an extremely far-fetched scenario. And given how Russia has been able to unsettle Ukraine's pro-Western government without firing a shot, I don't see why violence would be necessary to bring Kiev to heel. Watch the upcoming parliamentary elections in December to see if Moscow gets the pliable new government it wants.

    ............................................................................................................................................................................................


    Wow, FP. You have crap on your face for this lack of insight on foreign policy. It begs one to ask, How credible is FP if they think the kind of scenario Palin mentioned is "strange" and "far-fetched"? FP was so far off the mark that it makes their stories look more like political hack stories to damage the Republican party. Instead of providing us with real reporting and being a leader in your field, your penchant to disparage the GOP is clearly evident. Blake Hounshell must be getting some good mail this morning.

    Waiting for your apology.

    What's worse? The taste left behind from having your put foot in your mouth or the shame of having someone you consider intellectually inferior proving themselves to be better informed on a subject.

    Are you man enough to put a mea culpa in print on this one?

    i look forward to the FP follow-up article on this topic: "Palin: We Were Wrong"




  • blog.foreignpolicy.com



  • To: longnshort who wrote (7657)3/2/2014 11:12:39 AM
    From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
     
    Sirius XM Announces 'Breitbart News Saturday': Launch Show March 1st with Guests Ted Cruz,

    ..............................................................................................
    Breitbart ^ | 28 Feb 2014 | Breitbart News



    To: longnshort who wrote (7657)3/2/2014 10:39:52 PM
    From: joseffy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 16547
     
    Reparations event slated March 6 in Compton
    ......................................................................................................
    The Los Angeles Wave ^ | February 27, 2014 | Thandisizwe Chimurenga, Contributing Writer


    COMPTON — Reparations for African-Americans who endured 200-plus years of slavery in America will be among the topics featured at the second annual Reparations Day event March 6 in Tragniew Park here, organizers said.

    The Rev. Meri Kha Ra of Krst Unity Church and Minister Tony Muhammad of the Nation of Islam will speak during the program, hosted by the Compton National Reparations Day Committee.

    The event, which runs from 11 a.m. to 5 p.m., also will include live entertainment and student essay contest winners from local area high schools.

    Reparations is an internationally recognized principle of payment that a group or nation receives as a result of pain, suffering, damages or death.

    The concept of reparations for U.S. slavery has gained momentum in recent years as the Washington, D.C.-based National Coalition of Blacks for Reparations in America (N'COBRA) has aggressively argued that all beneficiaries of slavery — including the U.S. government and corporations — should financially compensate the descendants of former slaves.

    In 2000, the New York-based Harper's Magazine reported that the United States owes African-Americans more than $100 trillion in reparations.

    But the issue of reparations goes far beyond dollars, said Compton event organizer John Peoples.

    “What is Reparations? Repair. What is repair? Whatever it takes to make us whole,” Peoples said. “Reparations is not about money.”

    Tragniew Park is located at 2121 W. Alondra Blvd.

    Information: (310) 632-0577 or email NationalReparationDay3613@gmail.com.



    I’m all for giving money to any of the black residents of Compton who can prove they personally endured 200 years of slavery.



    3 posted on Sunday, March 02, 2014 10:21:01 PM by henkster

    there were slaves in California?



    7 posted on Sunday, March 02, 2014 10:22:44 PM by yldstrk





    “Reparations for African-Americans who endured 200-plus years of slavery in America” That would be some real OLD Africans.

    9 posted on Sunday, March 02, 2014 10:23:51 PM by Tupelo


    To: 2ndDivisionVet


    Here we go -- AGAIN!! Reparations for slavery?

    When a black woman is one of the richest people in America?

    When a black man was Secretary of State??

    When a black woman was Secretary of State?

    When black men have sat -- and do sit -- on the Supreme Court??

    When a black would-be despot sits in the White House?????

    When countless black men have risen to the top of the ranks of the richest in professional sports and show business?? Men like Hank Aaron. Men like Bill Cosby who... (Never mind. As we all know, Bill's either an Uncle Tom or Oreo Cookie, depending on which black race pimp you listen to.)

    And, how about Liberation Theology?

    Liberation from WHAT? The chance to achieve and succeed??

    Give me a break!!

    Let me make it clear right up front: I am NOT a racist. I supported Herman Cain in his run for the Senate and supported him in his run for the WH. And if Allen West goes for it, he, too, has my support.

    I also consider Thomas Sowell and Walter Williams two of the finest economists and minds extant today. In case you don’t know them, both are black.

    Sowell, Williams and Cain – among others -- have spoken out against those fellow blacks who castigate and vilify America for a slavery now long in our past. And ALL thinking men and women oppose the periodic calls for reparations.

    The fact is that the modern descendants of slaves brought here in chains in admittedly miserable, soul-gutting conditions now calling for reparations need to remember something:

    They should not only be glad to be in America, they should be glad to be ANYWHERE!

    Had their ancestors NOT been brought OUT of Africa – many by Muslim slave raiders --the blood of those ancestors would have run into the earth over there several centuries ago, victims of the OTHER black tribes that captured them in one of the interminable tribal conflicts STILL ravaging that sad continent and these modern day would-be "plaintiffs" would not even exist.

    And I would remind you that slavery is STILL practiced in parts of Africa (mainly by – American BLACK muslims LISTEN UP!! -- MUSLIMS) and Asia today. How ironic that disgruntled American blacks are embracing a system that participated mightily in their initial bondage – and would, if Islam takes root here, probably put any who cling to their Christianity back INTO BONDAGE – or to the sword. In fact, as the majority of muslims consider black folks as “sub-human”, many of you black muzzies will get the axe.

    95% of the African slaves who were transported across the Atlantic went to South and Central America, mainly to Portuguese, Spanish and French possessions, and that less than 5% of the slaves who crossed the Atlantic went to the United States, it was remarkable that the vast majority of academic research, films, books and articles concerning the slave trade concentrated only on the American involvement, as though slavery was a uniquely American aberration.

    To: 2ndDivisionVet
    Didn’t get their 50K from the Massive Fraud at USDA in Pigford ?



    12 posted on Sunday, March 02, 2014 10:25:54 PM by molson209


    Slavery never existed in he state of California so why Compton?