Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Rumour Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: David Carlson who wrote (31)	12/11/1997 11:02:00 AM
From: Zardoz	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 223

Rumour: has it that scientist have found a direct correlation between gravity and the stock market {aka what goes up, must come down} So to cure this problem for the FUTURE, they have determined that the best OPTION was to increae gravity by 10% thus decreaseing the returns of the Market by at least 20%. It is of course true that they may have bought all put options on the index's. Thus the scientist have guaranteed that they will profit the most from what can only be called insider information. Once again the efffect will be felt by all investors, but only those insider's will make the big profits. Appearnetly, all security commissions are investigating this... But scientist have determined that fines are directly related to cash balances of security officals accounts. Thus, it is expected that no action will be taken against the scientists as they have made a few deposits. Note: Make your decision based on anything you want... you can't win.

To: David Carlson who wrote (31)	12/11/1997 12:41:00 PM
From: marcos	Respond to of 223

-g- ... and a half hour later in Newfoundland. Personally I have two excuses-- bouts of insomnia and free ISP 12-6 am PST. I can't believe John Woods is a bad guy, he's a friend of Adrian's and has done a lot for the internet, as you have yourself. So as soon as there's time I'm off to dig up evidence to defend him... Btw, here's one of the very few threads without one of your profiles, they have a website in one of my recent posts there; exchange2000.com Great service, David....... muchas gracias .......... marcos

To: David Carlson who wrote (31)	12/11/1997 5:09:00 PM
From: marcos	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 223

Spent some time on the CBC website; cbc.ca and couldn't find the John Woods article, I don't know which program it was on, maybe it wasn't even CBC. I'm quite sure John Woods has a high opinion of the internet and its potential, though perhaps not for particular individuals and practices on it. There is a certain level of moronry here at times, as well as drunkenness, I bet there are other recreational pharmaceuticals, some of them likely substituted for prescribed medications. So he's not that far off, imho. He would likely cite constructive examples of SI is asked the right questions, and if they didn't edit it out. But that's just a rumour ............ cheers .............. marcos

To: David Carlson who wrote (31)	12/15/1997 8:33:00 PM
From: Al Cern	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 223

David, Boy you never know who you mioght run across. If you are one and the same, of Carlson online, I have to thank you profusely for your site. It is indispensable to me. I just wish you could do that screening thing. Also, "Hi Ed". Sincerely, Al Cern

To: David Carlson who wrote (31)	12/27/1997 8:58:00 PM
From: marcos	Respond to of 223

David, there is a rumour of a new thread; Subject 18653 ..... and it is rumoured that your input would be appreciated -g- Happy New Year .............. marcos