Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bread Upon The Water who wrote (244148)	2/6/2014 5:33:40 PM
From: neolib	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 540746

The interesting thing is that the defendants could have made what might be construed to be a useful objections to the work if they had simply said the tree ring data should be considered unreliable, due to the anomaly in the one data set that diverged during the instrumental record. But they didn't do that, instead, they wanted the anomaly included when the details of why it was not included had been worked out. They then accused the scientists of fraud, when there was a published paper detailing why it was done.