Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Identix (IDNX) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: chaz who wrote (5702)	12/11/1997 11:47:00 AM
From: CareyM	Respond to of 26039

Chaz, most of the people on this thread have day jobs so you'll probably get a response later today. Accounting is not my forte, so I can't help you there. And, you won't get "flamed" here, most of these folks are kind, intelligent, good hearted investors with a strong conviction that IDX will is a fantastic growth story about to explode. I will be interested to read more of your evaluations. Good Trading to you$$ Carey

To: chaz who wrote (5702)	12/11/1997 12:02:00 PM
From: Elvis Jones	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 26039

You shouldn't get flamed here. Several posts on this thread have encouraged bearish comments on IDX. It's our continuing search as to why we haven't gotten over the hump. Also, a thought I had on the Revs vs. Recvs question. I think there was shipments booked very late in the quarter. Of course, this doesn't explain why Recvs are greater than Revs. Might they have booked some revs as returns/doubtful? I don't know. That's why I deferred the question to Mike Hardesty. One thing your post will do is make the Commission look at these numbers on the next quarter's report. Happily Long IDX, Duke