Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Manmade Global Warming, A hoax? A Scam? or a Doomsday Cult? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sense who wrote (3717)	2/8/2014 4:53:33 PM
From: sense	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4326

But, you particularly have to love these: "Climate studies have predicted changes if emissions, and temperatures, continue to rise through the end of this century." Really ? If change (that isn't happening) continues on trend... there will be... change ? LOL!!! Oh my god... change is evil... we have to stop change. At any cost. Hmmm. How did they let that "if" get in there ? Only as a proof they're not biased and irrational ? And, "It’s easy to blame the big oil companies and the billions of dollars they spend on influencing the media and popular opinion. But the real reason is a lack of knowledge. I know, because I, too, was ignorant until I began researching the issue for a book on the future of snow." Apparently, what we really need is a book on the future of snow... jobs. Always little truths lurking in there enabling any propaganda: "the real reason is a lack of knowledge. I know, because I, too, was ignorant"... Yes. And, you still are. By definition. Because, it is untrue that the science is settled... or that what is postured as "science fact" CAN be even remotely close to correct, as it is untrue that PREDICTIONS can ever define "settled science"... until they BOTH explain WHY, first, AND then are repeatedly proven correct. Even a model that does appear to predict accurately (which no extant model does)... isn't a proof... if you can't present a well reasoned and fact based argument showing WHY it appears to be correct ?