SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : America On-Line: will it survive ...? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sowbug who wrote (6340)12/11/1997 11:35:00 AM
From: Brent D. Beal  Respond to of 13594
 
***every major brokerage in the country covering them for the last 3 years. AOL is an
institutional stock, and the others aren't. So AOL was most likely among the
companies I know to be the target of the much-ballyhooed "flight to safety.

I apologize, but "Flight to safely" and AOL in the same sentence? I'm afraid I can't continue this conversation. . .



To: Sowbug who wrote (6340)12/11/1997 11:36:00 AM
From: purecntry5  Respond to of 13594
 
All the internets showing strength. AOL, ATHM, AMZN, all positive even YHOO is holding up extremely well after running up so high in the past few weeks. Shorting these things are for masochists IMO. I hate to think what will happen to these stocks when the market moves up if I am still short.

Cowboy Brett



To: Sowbug who wrote (6340)12/12/1997 12:20:00 PM
From: Tim Kenney  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13594
 
>The difference is my grandma has never heard of those stocks, and you haven't had every major
brokerage in the country covering them for the last 3 years. AOL is an institutional stock, and the others
aren't. So AOL was most likely among the companies I know to be the target of the much-ballyhooed
"flight to safety."<

I am relieved to see that I am shorting shares to your grandmother. I have seen the enemy, and am not scared.