SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The coming US dollar crisis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Real Man who wrote (54636)2/10/2014 8:20:25 AM
From: ggersh1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Paxb2u

  Respond to of 71479
 
There was a better way out, TARP to the people
screw the banks, Jamie, Lord et al all needed
their big bonuses correct. WS is nothing but a way
to rob people of their money. Yield is created by
WS not the market .



To: Real Man who wrote (54636)2/11/2014 8:32:43 AM
From: ggersh  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71479
 
See, they failed anyhow, even though they get bonuses....-nfg-
Coming here?

Barclays Fires 12,000; Reports Horrible Earnings, Awards Itself Bigger BonusesSubmitted by Tyler Durden on 02/11/2014 - 07:58

It is not easy for one bank to anger more people with one announcement than what Barclays did in the past 24 hours. In one fell swoop, the British bank infuriated shareholders after announcing dismal earnings (an adjusted Q4 profit of about 200 million pounds and a statutory profit of less than 100 million as investment banking income slumped 37% as income fell 9% to 10.7 billion due to a fall in fixed income, and it took further charges related to a cleanup of the banking industry in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis) which sent the share price sliding, it then pissed off UK workers and taxpayers after it announced it would hike investment bank bonuses by 13% despite the abovementioned profit slump, and finally it crushed 9% of its workforce, or 12,000 workers, who are set to prepare pink slips as the bank "streamlines."



To: Real Man who wrote (54636)2/11/2014 8:44:57 AM
From: ggersh  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71479
 
Jesse...

jessescrossroadscafe.blogspot.com