Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PUHRTY who wrote (26139)	12/11/1997 12:16:00 PM
From: Riley G	Respond to of 55532

Subject: IRA & other things! Everyone has been told to call those shares. That's the only way we are going to win this battle. Everyone must also send those NASD & Brokerage firm letters out demanding their certificates! We are so close with the numbers reported to me from those on this list, and yet we are not there yet. Like I have always said, I have done all that I can do, and now it's up to US ALL to make this work. Those with IRA's need to have them converted into custodial NAME form!!! Riley G

To: PUHRTY who wrote (26139)	12/11/1997 12:17:00 PM
From: Riley G	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Complaints to regulatory agencies haven't stopped the practice of undeclared short selling. However, one way companies can protect themselves is to recommend to shareholders that they take physical delivery of their stock certificates. When physical delivery of stock certificates is demanded by a significant number of shareholders, the creators of nonexistent stock can be squeezed. The short sellers won't have stock certificates to deliver and thus they will cause losses for them and will cause them to move their undeclared short activities elsewhere. -------- The present special situation may have to do with the above comments and has nothing to do with Type 1 or Type 2 (cash/margin) accounts. We are not talking about legal shorting we are talking about blatant selling on nonexistent shares to flood the market. Thus keeping the price of a stock down and to terminal short it at the same time. If a terminal short is made (stock value = $0) then the shorts or market makers never have to worry about coving their shorts or extra shares that they flooded the market with. This is why every shareholder must demand delivery of their certificates! Riley G

To: PUHRTY who wrote (26139)	12/11/1997 12:17:00 PM
From: Riley G	Respond to of 55532

Tell your boss to cover his short position! RG

To: PUHRTY who wrote (26139)	12/11/1997 12:51:00 PM
From: Ellen	Respond to of 55532

Sorry.......can't hear ya! :))

To: PUHRTY who wrote (26139)	12/11/1997 1:21:00 PM
From: Emec	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 55532

PUHRTY, I am a former s/h but wasn't an SI member at the time. have not followed this in a long time. man am I glad I sold in the 3s. When I saw the merger, I knew the company was a joke. I spoke with Breton often but now believe that evrything he told me was a piece of cr*p. I would be extremely surprised if Riley was holding any significant number of shares. If he has any intelligence as an investor (which I think he does) I bet he has made a fortune off of OVIS/RMIL at the expense of all of his followers.