SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brumar89 who wrote (46493)2/15/2014 12:49:10 AM
From: 2MAR$  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 69300
 
these distinguished intellects (Behe, Berlinski)..... And they are distinguished how? Berlinksi is a self absorbed clown that tries passing himself off erudite, which anyone observing this perormance at these evolution debates can see his self absorbed, sophmoric foppishness.

Whats laughable, how shamelessly Berlinsky builds all his phony cases against evolution, when hiding behind Disco.dummies, claiming pontifically theres no documented evidence of transitional morphology in the fossil record. Yet, when in the company of truely gifted intellectual peers he's forced to admit the transitional sequence between reptiles into mammals is exceptionally well documented.

What? Here's your complete hypocrisy captured in video, in his own words admitting to all the records of transition of reptiles to mammals we do have as ------->"EXCEPTIONALLY WELL DOCUMENTED, NO QUESTION ABOUT IT" , end of quote.

And the look on his clown face tells the whole story as well as the laughter in the audience, for he's exposed as a complete liar & charlatan. Its all captured here with Ken Miller completely exposing him at 8:00 in for all to see, then goes on to drive the point home making him look like the total duplicitous fool that he is.

[yt]WVthBu6zCY0#t=479[/yt]



To: Brumar89 who wrote (46493)2/15/2014 1:09:59 AM
From: 2MAR$  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 69300
 
And here's the series of expressions on his face right after Dr Ken Miller gets him to admit he's been propulgating nothing but lies, his entire platform is built on the most unprofessional duplicty, but Miller puts an abrupt end to this poseur phony act & fake foppery.

Anyone can see the hint of a smirk mixed with shame as he just got exposed completely by Miller,and you just got owned too, since this one of your major apologists is just another complete ignorant fool & payed mouthpiece. He pretends there is no transitional sequencing in all his speeches but this night couldnt get away with it in full view of the true professionals. ( that aren't shady narscissists)

This is too funny to be pathetic, yet its both, so we'll just leave the trained monkey title in place,tyvm, and add lying little monkey to, looks like a little kid who just got caught doesnt he? Cause he did get caught, what a clown








To: Brumar89 who wrote (46493)2/15/2014 1:48:02 AM
From: 2MAR$  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 69300
 
Now watch again, how this squirming monkey Berlinski tries to snake his way out of his own admission ---->"there's nothing but the most exceptional evidence for the transitional sequencing between reptiles & mammals"

There's no way of ignoring every one of his recorded talks against evolution is built on denying any evidence exists, its all hogwash, then admits here in front of the cameras the complete opposite. Would you like me to fetch all those videos Berlinski is running his mouth on & on about there being no evidence?

Pen in hand trying to look erudite while he's completely aware of only abjectly lying about the facts but no one there to question it. Your expert is a trained monkey,yet not so dumb as to not know who's checks cash when he promulgates that disinformation.

He fails & falls down miserably at the end, totally flailing in clown fashion appealing for a rescue by running his mouth, but his ship is totally wrecked, the man exposed.






To: Brumar89 who wrote (46493)2/15/2014 2:11:56 AM
From: 2MAR$  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 69300
 
What hoot, now here's your expert Berlinsky lying to the camera, saying theres nothing in the fossil record that appears to be intelligently derived from Darwinian theory, or intelligently derives from anything else. And he says it so convincingly , because its on record hes only being a paid shill who recieves handsome checks from your hack anti-science website.

Yet we just saw in the other vid, Dr Ken Miller take only seconds to get him to admit the complete opposite, there's EXCEPTIONAL EVIDENCE FOR EVOLUTION.....tail between his legs.

This is your world of lies, propaganda & deciept, and its even more funny if you fail to think this fellow comes off as anything more than some narcissistic, pompous clown who got caught & exposed, your kind of clown.

Note the laughable title like his book ----> "David Berlinski - Evolution destroyed in under 5 minutes"

When he gets destroyed by Ken Miller in 5 seconds!!! ( hahaha !)




To: Brumar89 who wrote (46493)2/17/2014 1:32:59 AM
From: Greg or e1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Brumar89

  Respond to of 69300
 
You're oblivious that the trained monkey metaphor applies to you rather than
these distinguished intellects (Behe, Berlinski).

As for Krauss, you
realize he's a religious atheist and will tell lies with no guilt whatsoever.
If the three poo flinging Monkey Trolls that live under the Evolution Thread Bridge were truly oblivious, then they might be excused, but the fact is they are just "Horrible, Narcissistic, Machiavellian, psychopathic, and sadistic, people."
...................................................................

Internet Trolls Really Are Horrible People
Narcissistic, Machiavellian, psychopathic, and sadistic.
By Chris Mooney


The Internet is sadists' playground.Medioimages/Photodisc


In the past few years, the science of Internet trollology has made some strides. Last year, for instance, we learned that by hurling insults and inciting discord in online comment sections, so-called Internet trolls (who are frequently anonymous) have a polarizing effect on audiences, leading to politicization, rather than deeper understanding of scientific topics.

That’s bad, but it’s nothing compared with what a new psychology paper has to say about the personalities of trolls themselves. The research, conducted by Erin Buckels of the University of Manitoba and two colleagues, sought to directly investigate whether people who engage in trolling are characterized by personality traits that fall in the so-called Dark Tetrad: Machiavellianism (willingness to manipulate and deceive others), narcissism (egotism and self-obsession), psychopathy (the lack of remorse and empathy), and sadism (pleasure in the suffering of others).

It is hard to underplay the results: The study found correlations, sometimes quite significant, between these traits and trolling behavior. What’s more, it also found a relationship between all Dark Tetrad traits (except for narcissism) and the overall time that an individual spent, per day, commenting on the Internet.

In the study, trolls were identified in a variety of ways. One was by simply asking survey participants what they “enjoyed doing most” when on online comment sites, offering five options: “debating issues that are important to you,” “chatting with others,” “making new friends,” “trolling others,” and “other.” Here’s how different responses about these Internet commenting preferences matched up with responses to questions designed to identify Dark Tetrad traits:

E.E. Buckels et al, "Trolls just want to have fun," Personality and Individual Differences, 2014.


To be sure, only 5.6 percent of survey respondents actually specified that they enjoyed “trolling.” By contrast, 41.3 percent of Internet users were “non-commenters,” meaning they didn’t like engaging online at all. So trolls are, as has often been suspected, a minority of online commenters, and an even smaller minority of overall Internet users.

The researchers conducted multiple studies, using samples from Amazon’s Mechanical Turk but also of college students, to try to understand why the act of trolling seems to attract this type of personality. They even constructed their own survey instrument, which they dubbed the Global Assessment of Internet Trolling, or GAIT, containing the following items:

I have sent people to shock websites for the lulz.

I like to troll people in forums or the comments section of websites.

I enjoy griefing other players in multiplayer games.

The more beautiful and pure a thing is, the more satisfying it is to corrupt.

Yes, some people actually say they agree with such statements. And again, doing so was correlated with sadism in its various forms, with psychopathy, and with Machiavellianism. Overall, the authors found that the relationship between sadism and trolling was the strongest, and that indeed, sadists appear to troll because they find it pleasurable. “Both trolls and sadists feel sadistic glee at the distress of others,” they wrote. “Sadists just want to have fun ... and the Internet is their playground!”

The study comes as websites, particularly at major media outlets, are increasingly weighing steps to rein in trollish behavior. Last year Popular Science did away with its comments sections completely, citing research on the deleterious effects of trolling, and YouTube also took measures to rein in trolling.

But study author Buckels actually isn’t sure that fix is a realistic one. “Because the behaviors are intrinsically motivating for sadists, comment moderators will likely have a difficult time curbing trolling with punishments (e.g., banning users),” she said by email. “Ultimately, the allure of trolling may be too strong for sadists, who presumably have limited opportunities to express their sadistic interests in a socially-desirable manner.”