Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Manmade Global Warming, A hoax? A Scam? or a Doomsday Cult? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: longnshort who wrote (3836)	2/16/2014 1:48:17 PM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4326

Being pedantic, the Injuns were not from Asia, they were from Africa. You should try history some time: <any way the injuns weren't 'native' they were from Asia > In regular english, they were native to America. Maoris arrived in NZ only 800 years ago, but they are called native. Non-African people all came from Africa, and only 30,000 years ago for the male line and 90,000 years ago for the female line [replacing all non-African humans of the times]. They spread out and became native to wherever, differentiating over the many millennia. Nobody went from France to America before the Asians arrived. < "Few if any archaeologists—or, for that matter, geneticists, linguists, or physical anthropologists—take seriously the idea of a Solutrean colonization of America." [4] Two recent DNA studies serve to weaken the case that Haplogroup X2A migrated to the Americas by way of the Atlantic> Gaia required them to recycle carbon from vast graveyards of coal, oil, gas, tars, limestone, peat. We have been doing a good job. The question is whether we need to ease off on the rate of CO2 production. Mqurice