SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: longnshort who wrote (769938)2/17/2014 4:48:27 PM
From: tbolding  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1574046
 
Angry Khazar Jews Reject DNA Science and History

“Some people, historians and even scientists, turn a blind eye to the truth.”


Dr. Shlomo Sand
The Invention of the Jewish People

“In 10 years, there will be no more Israel.”


Henry Kissinger
New York Post (September 17, 2012)


As the truth slowly sinks in that they are not the seed of Father Abraham, but rather are of the bloodline of ancient King Bulan from Khazaria, the Khazars who comprise the vast majority of today’s people calling themselves “Jews” become more and more frantic. Many are concocting lies and myths and accusing modern-day scholars of falsely labeling them as “Gentiles.” It is evidently a real horror for a Khazar to be known as a “Gentile.” After all, for their entire lives, most Khazars have been taught by their rabbis the Talmud’s plain teachings regarding the inferiority of the Gentiles. The Gentiles, the Talmud says, are “unclean animals.” Their mission in life is to be nothing but “servants” to their Jewish Masters. Worse, the Talmud requires that, The best of the Gentiles are to be killed.”

Now, the Khazar Jew—which means virtually every “Jew” on planet earth—discovers through DNA testing that he or she is that loathsome creature he hates: a defective Gentile! What a supreme shock.

Scholars: Targets of Zionist Wrath What’s ironic is that the scholars who are the targets of the wrath of the Khazar Jews are themselves Khazar Jews. These scholars of history and of DNA science have come to the irrefutable conclusion that the Khazar Jews are not the bloodline of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.

The respected Dr. Eran Elhaik, for example, of Johns Hopkins Medical University’s McKusick–Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine, has done what most call the definitive DNA study on the origins of the Jews. Elhaik, an Israeli molecular geneticist who published his peer-reviewed findings in the prestigious Oxford journal, Genome Biology and Evolution, is highly respected in the fields of biology and genetics.

But Harry Ostrer, professor at Yeshua University’s Albert Einstein College of Medicine is of the opinion that the Jews can trace their origins all the way back to ancient times in Israel. That’s the straight “party line” of the Zionists.

Problem is, it’s Dr. Elhaik who has done the definitive research, not Ostrer. When Elhaik asked Ostrer for a copy of the statistics for his conclusions, Ostrer couldn’t produce any.

Dr. Elhaik, a no-nonsense kind of scientist, in interviews calls research critics “liars and frauds.” They’ve got their minds already made up before they do the research, he concludes.

Ostrer declines to be interviewed—another clear indication his views are primarily based on Zionist myths. But he did admit that, “some of the same genetic markers common among Jews can be found among Palestinians, as well.”

In other words, although he can’t produce any data for his unscientific belief about the Abrahamic ancestry of the Jews, Dr. Ostrer admits that the Palestinians, too, have Israelite DNA!

Ostrer, like some other Israelis, continues to cling to the old theories, now completely discredited, that were never based on proper DNA science and research.

World’s Top Geneticists Back the New DNA Findings The conclusion that today’s people claiming to be “Jews” are Khazars and have no blood connection to ancient Israel is backed up by many years of scientific, historical and archaeological research. It has been found that even such Jewish artifacts as gefilte fish, the round fur hats, and the symbol of the six-pointed star come from Khazaria. Almost none of the world’s so-called “Jews” are descendants of Abraham.

Genetics and biology Professor Dan Graur of the University of Houston smiles over the plight of Zionists who deny being Khazars. Dr. Elhaik’s a “very honest” man, and his DNA findings are right on target, says Graur.
Dr. Dan Graur, a world-famous Jewish geneticist who served on the faculty of Tel Aviv University for 22 years and is now at the University of Houston, smiles at the distress of the Zionists. Dr. Elhaik’s research is, he said, “very honest.” Graur is the recipient of the prestigious Humboldt Award, given to the world’s top biological scientist. In 2001, genetics research by Dr. Ariella Oppenheim of Tel Aviv University produced basically the same results as Dr. Elhaik. Oppenheim’s study also found that the Jews origins are in Khazaria, and that they are of Turkic bloodline. She also reported that some Palestinians have the chromosome in their blood indicating they are Cohanim and Israelite. But Oppenheim’s work has not stirred up the Zionists as much because she is not so public with her findings. So the Zionists’ wrath is reserved for Elhaik, whose research they greatly fear.

Definitive Study: “So Obvious” Dr. Shlomo Sand, history professor at Tel Aviv University and author of The New York Times bestseller, The Invention of the Jewish People, finds that the definitive study by Elhaik is “so obvious.” How can any reputable scientist refute it?

“Some people, historians and even scientists, turn a blind eye to the truth,” Sand remarked.

White Supremacists Agree With the Zionists Meanwhile, while panicky pro-Zionist scientists are unable to find holes or flaws in Elhaik’s study, white supremacists are also attacking it. They say that the Jews are real Jews, a race full of evil and hated.

“I’m not communicating with such people,” says Elhaik, a veteran of seven years in the Israeli Defense Forces. In fact, Dr. Elhaik adds that they have the same political motive as do the Israelis who oppose him.

“These people really are Nazis,” Elhaik adds, referring both to the Zionists and to white supremacists.

According to Elhaik, his Zionist opponents insist that they only wish to make sure that scientific research does not “defame” the Jews or Israel. That’s their unscholarly criterion. But Elhaik’s primary focus, he says, is not political. It is the genetics of illness. “Unless we know the genetics of a people we cannot solve medical problems,” he explains.


Zionists: “To Hell with Science” But many Zionist Jews don’t give one flip for medical illnesses. They want to be Jews, not Khazars. They hunger to be included in one of the twelve tribes of Israel. Only if DNA studies go their way can they continue to insist that the Land belongs to them.

“If God (the Jews spell his name G-d, without the vowel) did not give us the Land as the seed of Abraham,” one fanatical Jewish teacher explained, “we’re finished. The Palestinians will win the ideological war and the world will turn against us.”

“Any DNA scientist who says we are Khazars instead of the Chosen People, is a traitor to Israel. To hell with his science!”

We are reminded of the Apostle Paul who warned Christians to avoid the “foolishness of genealogies.”

Kissinger: “In 10 years, there will be no more Israel” Some Jews, however, are more pointed in their conclusions. Henry Kissinger, for example, former U.S. Secretary of State and now a Rothschild representative, recently (September 17, 2012) phoned Cindy Adams of the New York Post newspaper. His gray eminence told her he wished to be quoted on page 1 of the Post as stating:

“In 10 years, there will be no more Israel.”

Did Kissinger know of the DNA controversy that was soon to erupt in Israel and among the world’s elite over DNA research? Are the embarrassed New World Order Elite prepared to pull the plug on the whole Israeli experiment?



To: longnshort who wrote (769938)2/17/2014 6:56:41 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 1574046
 
Study: Obama is 5th best president in U.S. history

I knew something was wrong when jellybean Reagan was tied for first. One of the most damaging presidents tied for first??? Only in TX.



To: longnshort who wrote (769938)2/18/2014 1:01:16 AM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 1574046
 
Benghazi Saga Continues – Did the “End Really Justify the Means?
.............................................................................................................................
Political Realities ^ | 02/17/14 | Little Tboca




"What Difference Does it Make at this Point?"

Americans could shrug and give Obama & Clinton a free get out of jail card for the terrorist attack in Benghazi, if they had in fact stayed in the White House on 9/11/12 and did everything in their power to protect our four brave American men. But, that didn’t happen! Neither Obama nor Clinton were engaged and doing everything in their power to save our men. Both were AWOL it seems during the horrific murders in Benghazi.

Did Obama & Clinton know that Benghazi was under a terrorist attack? Absolutely, Obama was briefed by General Dempsey and Leon Panetta telling him that it was a terrorist attack. According to both men’s testimony, he left to prepare for his Las Vegas campaign shindig. Out of sight, out of mind for Obama – he never gave our men in Benghazi a second thought. Is this a dereliction of duty and is Obama an accomplice to murder??

Now it’s time to take Hillary Clinton to the chopping block, because as the SIC says the Benghazi terrorists attack could have and should have been prevented.

The Senate Intelligence Committee after months of investigation and testimonies basically said the “buck stops here” pointing at the State Department and Clinton’s negligence and failure to do the job we Americans hired her for – the SIC stated in no uncertain terms that the Benghazi terrorist attack could have and should have been prevented.

Questions for Clinton:

  1. Chris Stevens Ambassador to Libya was based in the U.S. Embassy in Tripoli (protected by our Marines – why would Clinton send him to Benghazi to prepare a safe haven for her when she comes for a visit to Benghazi on 9/11/12 when she knew Chris would be in danger?
  2. In 2012 there had been repeated security threats and explosions in Benghazi - why were the repeated requests by American diplomats to increase security at the Consulate in Benghazi denied?
Just hours before he died in a terrorist attack at the U.S. compound in Benghazi, Ambassador Chris Stevens sent a cable to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton painting a chaotic, violent portrait of the eastern Libya city and warning that local militias were threatening to pull the security they afforded U.S. officials Militia leaders told U.S. officials just two days before the attack that they were angered by U.S. support of a particular candidate for Libyan prime minister and warned “they would not continue to guarantee security in Benghazi, a critical function they asserted they were currently providing,” Stevens wrote in the cable the morning of Sept. 11, 2012. He also cited several other episodes that raised questions about the reliability of local Libya security. Read more: washingtontimes.com

Why was Jacob Sullivan (Deputy Chief of Staff) to Hillary Clinton instructed to change the CIA talking points before Rice was briefed for her Sunday show debut? CBS stated that a source revealed the Office of National Intelligence (DNI) were probably the ones responsible for editing the CIA talking points. References to “al Qaeda” and “terrorism” were removed from the unclassified talking points given to UN Ambassador Susan Rice.

Either Obama, Clinton or Jarrett gave DNI their marching orders to change CIA talking points before Rice was to appear on Nat’l TV. They were in charge!

  1. Why did Obama, Clinton, Rice, Carney and their gophers prepare political propaganda saying it was a protest in Benghazi caused by a video? Everyone in the White House knew it was a terrorist attack starting with General Ham, General Dempsey, General Petraeus, Leon Panetta, and Charlene Lamb – each of these people stated under testimony that it was a terrorist attack.
  2. Why did Clapper have a lapse of memory when he first testified that he didn’t know who changed the CIA talking points.
  3. Why did Clapper suddenly experience total recall about the CIA talking points being changed and why did he change his mind in midstream say, “Al Qaeda probably poses an even bigger challenge today and that the terror network “is any less” than it was a decade ago?
We can’t answer all of those questions at this time, but they all lead to the one who said, ”What difference at this point does it make?” Hillary was the one who was posting at 10:00 PM on 9/11/12 about the Benghazi attack mumbling something about protestors and a video. We know that Obama and Clinton knew that our four American men died in Benghazi do to a terrorist attack. Besides 3 Generals, Panetta, Gregory Hicks, Charlene Lamb, Reuters obtained 3 emails dispatched by the State Department’s Operations Center to Government offices in our White House, Pentagon, Intelligence community and FBI on the afternoon of September 11th 2012. reuters.com

I wrote a letter yesterday to John Boehner, Harry Reid & Congress asking them to do the right thing and place Obama and Clinton behind bars. So far haven’t rec’d one response back, but why should that surprise us, they’re politicians and it’s only about the murder of our four brave American men. For Obama & Clinton, will it be true that the “end really justifies the means?”

Will America relegate this horrific massacre in Benghazi to the ancient history shelves or will they stand up and fight? Let’s fight for the families who lost their loved ones due to Obama and Clinton’s blatant negligence – we’re Americans.



To: longnshort who wrote (769938)2/18/2014 10:09:32 AM
From: joseffy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574046
 
This guy brought in a Korean girl. I had no doubt in my mind this girl was a sex slave. This guy would not leave her side. They could barely communicate. He wanted to make all the arrangements.“During the ultrasound, she told one of the nurses that there were lots of girls in the house, and that the man hits them. She never came back for the abortion. I always wondered what happened to her. One of my co-workers said, ‘You’re better off to just let it go.’ “These girls would start crying on the table, and Dr. [Michael] King [the abortion doctor for whom Anderson worked] would say, ‘Now you chose to be here. Sit still. I don’t have time for this.’ “One doctor, when he was in the POC [products of conception] room, would talk to the aborted baby while looking for all the parts. ‘Come on, little arm, I know you’re here! Now you stop hiding from me!’ It just made me sick to my stomach.“The sound the suction machine made when it turned on still haunts me.”



To: longnshort who wrote (769938)2/18/2014 10:15:28 AM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 1574046
 
UPDATE: Police Say Man Randomly Sucker Punching People Not Part Of 'Knockout Game'...



Cambridge Police: Mass. Ave. Sucker Puncher Not Part Of ‘Knockout Game’


February 17, 2014 1



CAMBRIDGE (CBS) – Cambridge police say the man wanted for sucker punching at least three people over the weekend is not part of a disturbing national trend known as the ‘ knockout game.’

The series of unprovoked attacks happened in broad daylight Saturday afternoon between Massachusetts Avenue and Trowbridge Street.

In this first incident, according to a Cambridge police report, a man told officers he was walking towards Central Square when the suspect walked “directly towards him.”

Update:
Victims Of Attacks Speak Out

“He stepped to his left and the suspect mirrored that move. He stepped to his right and the suspect moved into his path once again. When the suspect was close enough, he punched (the victim) at least twice in the eye with a closed fist, knocking him to the ground,” the report stated.

The attacker then took off towards Harvard Square and hit two more men.

In the third incident, the suspect sucker punched the victim in the head, right after he left BoConcept furniture. That attack was captured on the store’s surveillance video.



A man seen in this surveillance image sucker punched a man on Mass. Ave in Cambridge, Feb. 15. (Image courtesy: BoConcept)

The store owner told WBZ-TV he actually helped victims number two and three.

“We ran out to help (the third victim), brought him inside. This guy had a bruised ear and cheekbone. He was going ballistic. Then the previous victim came in. We helped him, too. He had a big fat lip,” BoConcept owner Anthony Goodh said Monday.

Minutes earlier, the suspect had apparently been inside the Garden at The Cellar Restaurant, where he allegedly tried to punch the chef, Brandon Arms.

“Brandon was out here, and (the suspect) took a swing at him. Brandon shoved him away and started chasing him. He ran a little faster. I believe he chased him that way,” the restaurant owner, Steven Kapsalis, told WBZ.

There has been no arrest yet. One of the three victims had to be taken to a hospital to be treated for minor injuries.

Police have described the suspect as tall, black, in his mid-twenties wearing a black winter coat, a dark knit hat and blue jeans.

Investigators do not believe this was an example of the so-called “knockout game,” where people intentionally commit assaults, videotape them, and post them online.

“We believe at this point, that these assaults were not a case of “Knockout”, but a situation where an individual who was either under the influence or suffering from some type of mental illness was responsible for the assaults,” Cambridge Police Deputy Superintendent Jack Albert told WBZ in an email.