Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Timberline Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: balaw who wrote (48)	2/17/2014 8:04:38 PM
From: sense	Respond to of 104

Would take some work digging through all the old stuff on prior reports of their numbers and the relative locations of the holes to put it exactly in context with any real precision... But, the first thing it says it that "progress continues, apace" and it says that most loudly... Then, 6.80 meters at 10.96 grams per ton... is the most relevant number... as that defines a "continuity of mineralization within the main zone in the proposed bulk sample area"... meaning, that's adding directly to the quantity in and value of what they're proposing will be mined, first... and, starting soon... Any time you have 10 grams per ton in a fairly large intercept... has to be seen as "good"... Similar grades in a smaller intercept... will mean the actual values reported will be diluted by all the rock you have to move out of the way just to get to the stuff you want. A "mine sized" thickness in the intercepts... means lower costs of extraction... since all (or, more) of the rocks you have to move will have value in them...