Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: shasta23 who wrote (1693)	12/11/1997 3:17:00 PM
From: Matthew Leo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

Stefan - 3 to 5 bagger ($12 to 20) from 4 1/8 where the stock was when I gave that opinion. Paul - Fishy, because a look at the chart (to my eyes) reveals selling before the Cal Reed announcement. Fishy, because a more appropriate announcement would have had a summary from Cal about where he's taken the company todate and from Lev about where we are going. Buy - because the confusion that's resulted from the above has created a bargain. Buyers are getting a company miles ahead of where it was every other time the price traded at these levels. If you believe they can't produce batteries sell, if you believe they can buy. regards

To: shasta23 who wrote (1693)	12/11/1997 5:37:00 PM
From: Paul Dubsky	Respond to of 27311

Not that it matter much at this time, but I still don't see any record of Cal's actual sale of his 50,000 shares registered in November. He still has 60 days left to sell. Certainly don't think he's dumb enough to sell without the expectations of the stock going up considerably, or down considerably, which it has, but still no record of his sale at $8 or so. Anyone else have an actual confirmation of his sale? Stefan, as easily as it is to give up or jump from a "sinking ship", not all of them are the titantics of the world! I just can't imagine anything significant coming out of the company that would make the stock price be so ridiculously priced. I don't see how the company can be so dumb the second time around. So internal estimates of a December deadline aren't met. January is fine by me, in the long term picture. But, like I said before, there was some pretty heavy call options in VLNC through last week, as it appeared that someone thought an option to buy at $7 and $5 in December and January were good bets! Guess again.