To: RetiredNow who wrote (770341 ) 2/22/2014 9:18:33 PM From: Bilow Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574681 Hi mindmeld; Nice website. Unfortunately for you, it shows that the government's estimates for inflation are only wrong by about 0.5% per year. Look at the 6th column:Net Reduction in CPI-U inflation from Changes in Methodology As Reflected in the CPI-U-RS versus CPI-U Series (1980 to 2011) Table Described in Text following, Sources: ShadowStats, BLS Year Average CPI-U-RS (1) CPI-U-RS Yr/Yr Average CPI-U (2) CPI-U-RS Yr/Yr (1)-(2) Change in Annual Inflation* Cumulative Annual Inflation Shortfall 1980 127.1 82.4 0 1981 139.2 9.5% 90.9 10.3% -0.8% -0.8% 1982 147.6 6.0% 96.5 6.2% -0.1% -0.9% 1983 153.9 4.3% 99.6 3.2% 1.1% 0.1% 1984 160.2 4.1% 103.9 4.3% -0.2% -0.1% 1985 165.7 3.4% 107.6 3.6% -0.1% -0.2% 1986 168.7 1.8% 109.6 1.9% 0.0% -0.3% 1987 174.4 3.4% 113.6 3.6% -0.3% -0.5% 1988 180.8 3.7% 118.3 4.1% -0.5% -1.0% 1989 188.6 4.3% 124.0 4.8% -0.5% -1.5% 1990 198.0 5.0% 130.7 5.4% -0.4% -1.9% 1991 205.1 3.6% 136.2 4.2% -0.6% -2.5% 1992 210.3 2.5% 140.3 3.0% -0.5% -3.0% 1993 215.5 2.5% 144.5 3.0% -0.5% -3.5% 1994 220.1 2.1% 148.2 2.6% -0.4% -4.0% 1995 225.4 2.4% 152.4 2.8% -0.4% -4.4% 1996 231.4 2.7% 156.9 3.0% -0.3% -4.7% 1997 236.4 2.2% 160.5 2.3% -0.1% -4.8% 1998 239.7 1.4% 163.0 1.6% -0.2% -5.0%
1999 244.7 2.1% 166.6 2.2% -0.1% -5.1% 2000 252.9 3.4% 172.2 3.4% 0.0% -5.1% 2001 260.0 2.8% 177.1 2.8% 0.0% -5.2% 2002 264.2 1.6% 179.9 1.6% 0.0% -5.1% 2003 270.1 2.2% 184.0 2.3% 0.0% -5.2% 2004 277.4 2.7% 188.9 2.7% 0.0% -5.1% 2005 286.7 3.4% 195.3 3.4% 0.0% -5.2% 2006 296.1 3.3% 201.6 3.2% 0.1% -5.1% 2007 304.5 2.8% 207.3 2.8% 0.0% -5.1% 2008 316.2 3.8% 215.3 3.8% 0.0% -5.1% 2009 315.0 -0.4% 214.5 -0.4% 0.0% -5.1% 2010 320.2 1.7% 218.1 1.6% 0.0% -5.1% 2011 330.3 3.2% 224.9 3.2% 0.0% -5.1%
Now it's true that, over time, small changes do add up, hence the graphs you've posted. What you've provided is an independent verification that there is no hyperinflation, at least right now, and that the official government indications of inflation are substantially correct. You're arguing over stuff on the right side of the decimal point. But it's even worse than that for your argument. Look at the data after the split I put between 1998 and 1999. You can see that for the years 1999 to 2011, the "shadowstats" and the government figures differ by at most 0.1% and that they average to zero. In other words, since 1999, the government figures are spot-on. -- Carl