SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Presstek -- Stock of the Decade?? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nanny who wrote (7230)12/11/1997 2:47:00 PM
From: Brent  Respond to of 11098
 
First off, I apologize for the 'can you read' comment. That was not called for. I never should have typed it.

Second, I gave Acey the benefit of the doubt. I assumed in my numbers that revenues from hdlbrg did not decrease. I didn't even assume that they remained the same as 97. I assumed they increased! In my example, they stayed at Q4 97 level, which would be a dramatic increase from 97 to 98.

Even assuming that, you saw how ridiculous Acey's prediction is!

BTW, I thanked Acey for his opinion and said I would listen to PRST's instead. I never said he couldn't/shouldn't give his opinion and you shouldn't ever take someone else's opinion as the gospel.

What you should do is show me how PRST will double their revenue when they announce a decrease from an 80% client.

Also, We KNOW the orders for the DI will be down. They HOPE other orders will be up enough to offset it. If they were certain or even felt comfortable about that, why would they announce it?

Brent



To: Nanny who wrote (7230)12/11/1997 2:57:00 PM
From: Larry Ricker  Respond to of 11098
 
I agree that Brent's tone was condescending. But when it comes to excessive use of capitals, exclamation points, bold print, and generally abusive tone, you win the prize. Your latest is just one more in a long series.

I have to admit, however, that if you weren't around this thread would be pretty dull. And you are entitled to your opinions, of course. I happen to think they're misguided, but that's just my opinion.

Larry



To: Nanny who wrote (7230)12/11/1997 3:07:00 PM
From: Father E.  Respond to of 11098
 
<<I swear>>
Tsk, Tsk Tsk.

I don't