SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tejek who wrote (771723)2/27/2014 2:06:18 AM
From: Broken_Clock  Respond to of 1574491
 
TV: Most shocking thing is how US gov’t was “very concerned” about Fukushima radiation hitting West Coast and affecting Americans — Public told that everything fine (VIDEO)
JapanFocus, Kyle Cleveland, Temple U. (Japan), Feb. 17, 2014: Nuclear disaster in Fukushima [...] has given rise to one of the most significant public health crises in modern world history [...]

Democracy Now!, Feb. 26, 2014 (at 54:30

in) — AMY GOODMAN, host: What most shocked you when you were doing research for this book? — EDWIN LYMAN, Sr. Scientist at Union of Concerned Scientists: Being in Washington for a long time, very little shocks me. But [...] while the US government was telling the American people there was nothing to fear from Fukushima [...] internally [...] there was a much different story. So we’ve learned from a lot of FOIA documents that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the White House were actually very concerned about the potential impact of radiation from Fukushima affecting [...] Americans on the West Coast. They were furiously running calculations to try to figure out how bad it could get, but there was no sense of this in what they were telling the public.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, March 17, 2011: There was a DITTRA and NARAC dose estimate that was done for California [...] estimating what we believe to be very high doses to children, and a thyroid (inaudible) dosage. [...] Q: Is this information being considered for releasing publicly [...] A: No. No, we’re not planning any press release [...] DITTRA and DoE runs for California may have been prompted by queries from the state [...] but there is some background that is politically sensitive that I can share with you offline. [...] DITTRA result was four rem [40 millisieverts] to the thyroid of a one year-old child based on one year integration [...]

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, March 17, 2011: DoE current model status – they are going to reduce ground shine effects in models and use a much less conservative source term prediction [...] no significant dose. DoE models- 42 millirem [420 microsieverts] to thyroid in Hawaii based on ground deposition (i.e. no release above background). 4rem is off the table for CA (California). Weather forecast has not changed from what was predicted yesterday. Emphasis on model peer review [...] emphasis on one set of Federal government assumptions. Governors concerned that they are not being briefed by Feds but by industry representative.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, March 18, 2011: Shine dose would be 80mR [800 microsieverts] way west in the islands of AK (Alaska) [...] Working on summary for Congressionals. [...] Call last night was just western states. Today expanded to all of them. Communicating with states: been trying to funnel information to RSLOs. MJ: what about pushing state communications to DoE since they are responsible now [...] Want to emphasize with team – just met with Japanese ambassador [...] There is not a lot of time. It’s very serious in Japan. [...] They are in a very difficult situation right now.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, March 19, 2011: What’s the worst case [for] the West Coast? We were talking now we got Reactor 3 today, if Reactor 3. Tepco has come to our staff in Japan, they’re worried about the bottom of the core vessel.

Watch the full interview with Lyman here — ( h/t missingsky102)



To: tejek who wrote (771723)2/28/2014 12:11:11 PM
From: Brumar891 Recommendation

Recommended By
FJB

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574491
 
Brewer wins respect from NOBODY with this cowardly cave in. The liberals already hate her and will continue to do so. She just gave in to bullying and lost respect from conservatives. A shame.



To: tejek who wrote (771723)2/28/2014 12:15:41 PM
From: joseffy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574491
 
Travel Agent: Brutal Winter Causing 'Desperation'...



To: tejek who wrote (771723)2/28/2014 12:16:31 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 1574491
 
Historic Cold Shuts Michigan Schools...




To: tejek who wrote (771723)2/28/2014 12:16:54 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 1574491
 
Record Subzero Days in Midwest...




To: tejek who wrote (771723)2/28/2014 4:37:57 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574491
 
Just askin...

I don't think anyone should be refused service on the basis of their demographic, but there is also the dimension in service regarding 'what the service is', or 'how the service is provided.' It seems the conscientiousness of the service provider, especially when placed in a position of personal conflict should be considered. The current politically correct solution is to make one solution fit all, circumstances be damned.

This was aimed at conservative Christians but...

* What about refusing to serve customers as a simple matter of conscience, or moral conflict?
* Can a business owner refuse to serve an unruly or threatening customer?
* Will you be forced to provide service to a customer who is dirty and smelly, and who is driving away other customers?
* Will physicians be forced to perform abortions?
* Can a Jewish cake maker be required to make a swastika cake?
* Can a Catholic pharmacist be forced to distribute birth control pills?
* Can a Muslim business owner be required to serve bacon or liquor?
* Can a bath house towel/massage girl be required to massage pervs?

I don't see this trend based in discrimination (as advertised).

I see it more as an attack on the right of conscientious objection, which was once a liberal standard. Now it appears no one is is left to champion people of conscience. Sorry to see that.