SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : NEXTEL -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: P.T.Burnem who wrote (3629)12/11/1997 7:00:00 PM
From: PHG  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 10227
 
PT:

To explain NXTL with a common sense approach.
Do you remember when most people had one TV and an antenna
on their roof. Even with a rotor they were lucky to receive 13-20
stations, with a one time cost of $125. How different it is now.
It costs so much more now. But we have large screen TV's with a very sharp picture, stereo sound and 100+ stations to choose from and more.

Remember the rotary dial telephones with no memory or
pushbuttons. No redial, call forwarding, or caller idea.

Would you go back to save the difference in money you pay
now?

The bottom line is convenience and service. Once you
experience it, its hard to do with out it. Cost becomes
secondary to Time and Convenience.

NXTL at the present time is not targeting the everyday
consumer. Understandable some people will not relate to the
advantages of NXTL until they have hands on experience.

I not sure if NXTL needs to be the most valuable player
to share in the glory of success.

PHG



To: P.T.Burnem who wrote (3629)12/11/1997 7:06:00 PM
From: Satellite Mike  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10227
 
Multiply 3,000 (simultaneous phone conversations) times 5,000
towers (and growing fast). That comes to fifteen million
simultaneous conversations. How much could a network like that
generate per minute? When (not if) better digital technology
becomes available (software change), capacity will compound.
Direct Connect is six to one already. 15MHz X 6 = the same as,
that's right 90MHz of analog capacity (with no eavesdropping).
That's almost double of all the nation's analog capacity (25MHz
X 2), and without the 8 cents connect fee to Ma Bell. Your the
one who's cheesy. So short it and take your worthless reasoning
elsewhere.



To: P.T.Burnem who wrote (3629)12/11/1997 7:26:00 PM
From: Arnie Doolittle  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 10227
 
"McCaw has invested in several high-risk ventures and he can afford to lose it all. Can you?"

Yes, but he won't and neither will I. This company could be sold in a New York second for more than its current market cap.

I don't know anything about the # of simultaneous phone calls per cell site. Is there anyone else on this thread with the technical know-how who can address this issue? Let's see, you say 3000 simultaneous phone conversations is max per cell site. IOW 6000 people. Now is that analog or 3:1 iDEN tdma? And NXTL now has over one million iDEN customers. Gosh, they must be almost out of capacity. NOT!

But for now let's take your numbers. NXTL had 2,400 cell sites in June and they have 3,600 more planned. (Of those, as of June 3,050 were already zoned and 3,300 were leased.) Again as of June, they expected to have 4,500 cell sites by the end of 1998. Those numbers have probably increased since then. In other words, by the end of 1998, NXTL will have a theoretical limit of 13,500,000 simultaneous calls if all cell sites are maxed out. When all 6,000 cell sites are installed, the max increases to 18 million. Since each call requires two parties, double those numbers (or is that what "full duplex" means?). And how many customers would NXTL have to have to even approach these capacity numbers? Double or triple that amount? Or more? Ney, there's plenty of capacity in NXTL's system. Now how much money would a buyer pay for a little ol' company with such limited capacity? If this is cheesy, please pass the cheese. ADVANTAGE NEXTEL.

Nice try though.

Arnie



To: P.T.Burnem who wrote (3629)12/11/1997 11:22:00 PM
From: JF Quinnelly  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10227
 
Yah, PT, you're analysis is right on the money, and we're all wet being long this stock. Thanks for your concern about the unnecessary risks we are taking with our money. We are all moved with your charity. It's not often that someone will spend their valuable time looking out for others, and we longs are all suitably impressed. You are a gentleman and a genius. Now go away.