SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (772413)3/1/2014 5:51:59 PM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576166
 
You do realize that the only reason she said that was because of the way Dubya sat on his hands when Russia invaded Georgia. And Grandpa was highly incensed.

The idea of getting militarily involved with Russia over the Ukraine or Georgia, Belarus is already in Russia's orbit, is insane. Especially over the Crimea, which is where Russia has a major naval base on the Black Sea. The Crimea has been a treasured possession of Russia for well over a century. Khrushchev game control over the Crimea to Ukraine because he loved the country and was trying to make up for what Stalin did. As long as the Ukraine was part of the Soviet Union, no problem.

Military action is out of the question. Arming the Ukraine is also a bad idea.

It doesn't mean we are totally helpless, though. Things could be done and arguably should have been done with respect to Georgia. We should get off our duffs and build LNG terminals in the US and Europe. Sell the NG are prices lower than the Russians are. That would blow a big hole in their budget. Encourage Europe to frack shale to produce their own gas. Considering that Russia is not above playing games with supply, they should go for it.



To: i-node who wrote (772413)3/2/2014 1:57:20 PM
From: bentway  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 1576166
 
So, Dave, what do YOU think our response should have been to both of those Russian actions?