Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Donner Minerals (DML.V) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Famularo who wrote (2128)	12/11/1997 4:51:00 PM
From: Buckey	Respond to of 11676

Frank: Ignore him. Everyone Ignore Him. He told us last Friday that his broker told hime to short DML under a buck. He is a s--- disturber trying to get everyone going. NO credibility. A big JOKE only. To DON; News of Assays is only available from NAI and DML key personel who have also likley told Canacord. Watch the patterns. Any buyers over the ninety cent mark from last Friday will likely be the same buyers if this thing runs up again. I bet they are more careful this time with their big mouths. They may not have the net to blame this time. - NOT that they were justified last time. To Hutch: actually I am predicting what you will write - he will never be fully invested because he is not even in the game. I bet he has nothing of DML and/or NAI long short or otherwise.

To: Famularo who wrote (2128)	12/11/1997 4:54:00 PM
From: Zardoz	Respond to of 11676

Actually you are missing two things: 1) JJ chances are not 50%, his probablity is 50%, his odds of being right are at 25%, and his success rate is ZERO! 2) Your risk Frank is what you invested. His risk is UNLIMITED! That's why I'll wait till he's fully invested... PS: JJ's has a masochist attitude! Anyone going out of his way to point out that he's against a stock, after he's been wrong once already, is truly a person that wants pain.

To: Famularo who wrote (2128)	12/11/1997 5:18:00 PM
From: JJ	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11676

Didn't say they were fake just the wording was vastly overstated.Companies like this can get away with it.Can you say ala CRN?Just wait and see.

To: Famularo who wrote (2128)	12/11/1997 6:45:00 PM
From: Ed Pakstas	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11676

Frank. Pay no attention to the ----...He got on this thread when the DML was 1.00-1.10 before the last run-up...A quick glance at his profile will tell you that he has already screamed out the fact that he was broke... As a matter of fact, if you go back far enough he's claimed he's lost on another deal previous to that...It appears that he has an intelligent broker which is probably on the same level as he is...Apparently he shorted this puppy just prior to the last run-up on his brokers advise... In any case, it looks like we maintained a fairly narrow trading range most of the day, on relatively light volume...Nice little pop near the end of the day...which held reasonably well into the close (I'm assuming that it may have been some smart shorters covering their butts prior to the next NR...)... In light of today's action throughout the markets, for this puppy and the NAI to close where they did, indicates to me that we are sittin' on something that may offer some uptrending adrenaline rushes for a second time... GLTUA ...ed PS: Oh Yeah!!! and JJ here's a special message just for you... kenai.net