SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: freelyhovering who wrote (246216)3/2/2014 5:09:26 PM
From: Metacomet  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 542160
 
It really is fascinating how this thread has become a forum on one posters pre-occupation on how poor folks are causing all of our problems and the energy being expended, totally without effect, I might add, to disabuse him of these notions..



To: freelyhovering who wrote (246216)3/2/2014 5:20:01 PM
From: bentway  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 542160
 
I think we should go way beyond free condoms. We should provide every high school age girl free birth control pills, also free from any parent's knowledge. We should provide any high school age boy free tube tying if he desires it. We should have free condom dispensers placed all over every high school, in every drug store and Seven-Eleven.

Maybe have high school water fountains dispense birth control drugs with the water. Make making babies a deliberate opt-in, instead of a too-often forgotten opt-out.

I can honestly say that making a baby, although I knew it was a risk, was far from my mind while having sex. I did have a partner who once blurted out after a condom broke, "I get pregnant so easily! But, I'll have your baby and we can get married!", much to my horror. Fortunately, no pregnancy occurred.



To: freelyhovering who wrote (246216)3/3/2014 1:02:00 PM
From: Bread Upon The Water  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 542160
 

You would lose the bet. Having been an AFDC worker before my current career,

Your "experience" doesn't apply to the "new" rules of welfare environment I propose. You are just projecting--as am I, but at least my projection is based on a prewelfare experience/environment. Whether it would revert to that again is an open question. If it didn't we could always go back to the way it is.