SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sam who wrote (247054)3/10/2014 4:04:00 PM
From: Bread Upon The Water  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 543448
 

I should have added to the advantages that fossil fuels enjoy over solar that, for the most part, negative externalities aren't put into the cost equation. I include in negative externalities not only pollution and the widespread diseases that they cause (why do you think that asthma is a world wide epidemic these days, or that people in China wear masks in many of their cities?), but the wars that we have fought over the past several decades because the government wishes to protect one of the primary sources of those fuels.

Yes, that is a cost of fossil fuels that gets hidden. How would you assess that cost as well as the cost of conversion to Green to help incentivsize that conversion action?

Did you happen to see the link Wharf, provided in his message on what California was doing to accomplish its "Green" goals?

energy.ca.gov