Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : American International Petroleum Corp -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: qdog who wrote (5771)	12/11/1997 7:49:00 PM
From: arnold silver	Respond to of 11888

Message-id: where are the numbers ,Gary is going to be on the chat line with 23 people or less, If every thing is so great why cant every interested party get in ? I think it should be a conference call, and let all the stockholders participate Where is george Faris ?He would never stand for this crap,Cutting out the majorityof the stockholders is very very sick, I think we need a new pr group, Arnie ( this is in reference to a report that Gary (Mill) will join aol chat board tomorrow.)

To: qdog who wrote (5771)	12/11/1997 7:50:00 PM
From: DRRISK	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11888

Qdog, <<<<<. I believe the loan or whatever was more than what it appears to be.>>>>>> I don't think that Faris wants to deal with Hunt Oil as the JV. I think he is looking to rope in a bigger fish and that the Hunts are playing this one only to be in the game if that fails. If they take it I think that it would mean the concession is not as promising as we all hope. They are investors on this one IMHO. DrRisk

To: qdog who wrote (5771)	12/12/1997 12:48:00 AM
From: Laserbones	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11888

You don't see any problem with including these two potentially large structures with a tiered agreement? How common are such agreements? I know you've discussed this in past posts, but it would seem that a large oil company upon seeing decent data--and I don't know if the seismic will be of any particular quality--could use such an agreement as both a hedge against losing major cash while at the same time getting a stake in a promising area. I don't see a problem with such a scenerio...interesting that the latest news was specific to Chikuduk and Begesh (Begash). Again, as a shareholder looking long term and not for the quick dollar, I don't want to see these areas handed over for a song just to raise cash. If a tiered agreement is made, would you expect the partner to completely manage the exploratory aspects with aipn much the spectator? Greg