Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Greg or e who wrote (49253)	3/12/2014 3:10:14 AM
From: Solon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 69300

"3) Therefore, the Universe Must Have a Cause (Inferred from the Principal of Causality) (4) The First Cause Must Be Eternal and Uncaused (Declared by definition)" There is nothing there that presumes the existence of a "first cause"--only of a cause. THINK ABOUT IT! You are too too stupid! Even if the universe requires a cause, it does not require a god which is a concept entirely invented and imagined. You see, Bumpkins. The idea "first cause" is a gratuitous invention. It is like saying the last number. But what is the last number and why does there have to be one just because all numbers are logically implied by the number before? Mostly, the universe or universes are way beyond out grasp. But what we do know is that gods are invented by men and that the idea of gods (and first causes) are invented by men! We also know that TROLLLS eat their own feces, but that is another tale!