Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (774255)	3/11/2014 3:34:08 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574056

Less, I'm very familiar with the concept of "manifest destiny." What I don't agree with is the notion that America established a systematic policy of Indian removal. America's number one priority was expansion, not genocide. I'll grant you that in many cases, the forcible relocation (and slaughter) of Natives just to satisfy the goals of expansion could count as genocidal. But there were also many cases where the white man and Natives coexisted peacefully, just like many of the Founding Fathers intended in the early 1800's. And there were many Natives who chose (i.e. not forced) to assimilate into American society. Overall, the picture is rather complicated, and I think it's overly simplistic to just come out and say America is guilty of genocide. IMO, that cheapens the term and isn't necessary when it comes to exposing the ugly side of manifest destiny and "how the West was won." Tenchusatsu