SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: longnshort who wrote (774478)3/12/2014 1:27:06 PM
From: TideGlider4 Recommendations

Recommended By
Brumar89
FJB
longnshort
steve harris

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1572658
 
Remembering The Alamo
What government should learn.
3.6.2014


178 years ago today, the Alamo fell to the Mexican army under the ruthless President General Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna.

Everyone knows the story of the Alamo. It's been referenced in movies, books, TV and many other mediums. But why does the story strike a cord with the American public? What is it that drives us to the heroes of the Alamo and the sacrifices they made in defending Texas? It’s a story of selfless sacrifice, courage, bravery, patriotism and honor.

A few months before the siege, Texans drove out Mexican troops from Texas following this route. 100 men were stationed at the Alamo for defensive purposes. They were joined by a small number of reinforcements led by co-commanders William B. Travis and James Bowie. Sometime later, Davey Crockett and some of his men joined the defense. On February 23, 1836 Santa Anna and 1,500 troops surrounded the Alamo. A siege began and only small skirmishes were reported with zero casualties on both sides. In that time, William Travis sent a letter to ask for reinforcements. In the truest sense of courage and honor, and in the American spirit he wrote:

“If this call is neglected, I am determined to sustain myself for as long as possible, and die like a soldier who never forgets what is due to his own honor and that of his country – Victory or Death.”

It was not until the last 24 hours, after 13 days of siege, that a real battle ensued. In the battle, the Alamo defenders fought valiantly and nearly all were killed including Travis, Bowie, and Crockett.

The defense of the Alamo allowed General Sam Houston to build a large enough army to route Santa Anna and his men. “Remember The Alamo” was a constant battle cry at the Battle of San Jacinto, six weeks later. In the battle that lasted only 18 minutes, roughly 630 Mexican troops were killed and 730 captured while only 9 Texans died. Three weeks after being captured, Santa Anna signed a peace treaty, paving the way for the Republic of Texas.

The men who fought and died in Texas were ordinary people who took up arms to defend a great country. With the threat of death hovering above them for 13 days, they refused to leave their post (yes, a very tiny group did) and surrender. Even Davey Crockett, a man who already served as a United States Congressman, took up arms to defend Texas. Nearly all politicians today can learn a very big lesson from the men who lost their lives. There is a greater good besides your own self-interests. Politicians need to stop their petty differences and make the correct political sacrifices even if it costs them their career. They must be able to stand up to the political correctness without worry about what the consequences might be.

Ted Cruz is a Texan, and he acts like it. He is not afraid of demonizing his own party and possibly sacrificing his career in order to bring our country back to what the founding fathers fought for. The American people have had enough of the political correctness that has been drowning this country and holding us back from the being the great power we used to be. Washington should mark this day, March 6, as National “Remember the Alamo” day in honor of those who gave their lives and the selfless sacrifices they made.



To: longnshort who wrote (774478)3/12/2014 1:32:47 PM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation

Recommended By
FJB

  Respond to of 1572658
 
David Jolly's victory spells trouble for Democrats nationwide

...................................................................................................................
The Tampa BAY Times ^ | March 11 | ADAM SMITH




To: longnshort who wrote (774478)3/13/2014 1:22:55 AM
From: THE WATSONYOUTH1 Recommendation

Recommended By
joseffy

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572658
 
.......the story behind the story.....as heard on Levin's radio show.............the bottom line is Republican big shots DID NOT want Jolly.............Boehner and Jeb Bush tried repeatedly to recruit other RINO candidates........read how the Republican establishment TRASHED Jolly the very Friday (3/7/13) BEFORE the election. I think they leaked this stuff to Politico on purpose. They thought he would lose and were bailing out before a vote was counted. This is the kind of Republican leadership we have.........look at Boehner....all he cared about was whether Jolly would promise that he would support Boehner for House Speaker. Now.....do you wonder why the establishment Republicans did not want him.........well just listen to this campaign spot by Jolly and it is clear why. He sounds like a constitutional conservative.

bcove.me

National GOP turns on Florida candidate

By ALEX ISENSTADT | 3/7/14 5:05 AM EST

CLEARWATER, Fla. — Their frustration had been mounting for weeks. But by late January national Republicans had had it with David Jolly, their candidate in Tuesday’s nationally watched Florida congressional special election.

The candidate had just told the state’s top political reporter that he disagreed with an ad the party was airing against his Democratic opponent — a spot paid for with the nearly $500,000 the GOP had already spent on Jolly’s behalf.

“Are you f—-ing kidding me?” a senior National Republican Congressional Committee official told a Jolly staffer over the phone, according to two sources familiar with the conversation. Would the Jolly campaign prefer that the NRCC stop spending money in the race altogether? the official asked.

Over the past week, a half-dozen Washington Republicans have described Jolly’s campaign against Democrat Alex Sink as a Keystone Cops operation, marked by inept fundraising, top advisers stationed hundreds of miles away from the district in the state capital and the poor optics of a just-divorced, 41-year-old candidate accompanied on the campaign trail by a girlfriend 14 years his junior. The sources would speak only on condition of anonymity.

Publicly, both sides declined to discuss the dispute. In a brief interview here this week, Jolly shrugged off questions about how he’s conducted his campaign. Andrea Bozek, an NRCC spokeswoman said, “We don’t discuss internal conversations we have with campaigns,” but added that “local and national Republicans have been working around the clock to elect David Jolly on Tuesday.”

Heightening the GOP’s anxiety is the national focus on the race — a battle for control of one of the nation’s few true tossup congressional districts, the outcome of which will inevitably be seen as a measure of the political environment heading into the November midterm. Republicans know that if Jolly loses, Democrats will point to the race as evidence that 2014 isn’t the lost cause for them that many have been predicting.

It is rare for party officials to criticize one of their own candidates, even anonymously, days before an election. One explanation may be so they can point to Jolly — as opposed to the national political mood or the ineffectiveness of attacks against Sink over her support for Obamacare — if he loses.

Standing outside Lenny’s Restaurant, a popular breakfast spot here, Jolly sounded upbeat.

“We’re one team. We’re one team. We share a commitment to winning this seat, because we share the same view of government,” he said. “Look, campaigns always have story lines to them. The important thing we focus on is what our party stands for, what I stand for, and what Alex stands for.”

Aides to Jolly did not respond to several requests for comment on specific criticisms of the campaign.

( Also on POLITICO: Poll: Alex Sink, David Jolly in tight race)

Despite Jolly’s problems, polls show a close race, with Sink narrowly ahead heading into the election. Sink, the state’s former chief financial officer who narrowly lost the 2010 race for Florida governor, has made her own missteps, most recently drawing criticism for poorly phrased remarks about illegal immigrants. She has appeared uneasy with the national exposure during the race: When NBC anchor Chuck Todd asked to moderate one of the forums, for example, her campaign vetoed it, saying it wanted a more local figure to ask the questions.

Jolly, a longtime aide to Young who left Capitol Hill in 2007 to start a lobbying career, wasn’t the Republican establishment’s first choice. In fact, GOP officials sought out three other prospects, eager to find a candidate with a higher and more appealing profile than they believed Jolly possessed.

After longtime GOP Rep. Bill Young died in October, House Speaker John Boehner called Rick Baker, a popular former mayor of St. Petersburg, and pressed him to run for the vacant seat. The Baker courtship didn’t stop there: Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush also pushed the former mayor to run, according to two sources. (Bush has since gotten behind Jolly, appearing in TV ads calling him “the best candidate to go to Congress.”)

After mulling it over for a few days, Baker turned them down. By that time, Jolly’s name had emerged as a possible candidate. But national Republicans went after two other possibilities — former Clearwater Mayor Frank Hibbard and Pinellas County Sheriff Bob Gualtieri — both of whom also declined. That left Jolly to face off against state Rep. Kathleen Peters and one other candidate in the Republican primary.

As soon as the GOP primary began, problems emerged. State Sen. Jack Latvala, a powerful local powerbroker, bypassed Jolly and threw his support to Peters. And in a bizarre twist, Young’s family was divided: The late congressman’s widow, Beverly, backed Jolly while his son, Billy, was behind Peters.

Jolly won the mid-January primary easily. But his campaign entered the general election nearly broke — and, according to multiple sources, lacking a clear plan to catch up to Sink in the cash race. Jolly hadn’t hired a finance director, and some Republicans grumbled that he was reluctant to make fundraising calls.

Republicans grew worried. According to two sources familiar with the matter, NRCC officials pressed the Jolly campaign on whether it had come up with a blueprint to address the fundraising problems and counter the looming Democratic attacks on his lobbying career.

The Jolly camp response was dismissive: We’ve got it under control, staffers told them.



Unconvinced, the NRCC in late January dispatched a finance staffer to Florida to help the candidate fill his coffers. Soon after that, the committee sent three additional aides to the state to help Jolly’s team in a variety of ways.

With Jolly’s campaign basically insolvent, Democrats began pounding him on the airwaves. In the three weeks following the GOP primary, Sink and her Democratic allies outspent the Republican side nearly two-to-one on advertising. Many of the Democratic spots would echo an attack line that the party would use throughout the race: Don’t elect a D.C. lobbyist as your next congressman.

Continue Reading






One ad from the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee portrayed a suit-clad Jolly imitator walking from a K Street office to the Capitol. “So little gets done for us, while the special interests have lobbyists like David Jolly. He’s what’s wrong with Washington,” the narrator said.

To date, Jolly has raised $1 million to Sink’s $2.5 million. National Republicans say it’s hard to fathom how a candidate with deep connections to the D.C. influence world — and one who’s running in such a high-profile race — has struggled to draw donations.

Jolly’s lack of cash has left him dependent on outside conservative groups over which he lacked control — including the NRCC and Karl Rove-founded American Crossroads — to do much of his bidding. The NRCC spot that Jolly distanced himself from, to the consternation of GOP officials, criticized Sink for using a state plane for personal travel. Washington Republicans believed it was an effective attack; Jolly suggested it wasn’t fair game, saying there was more “nuance” to Sink’s conduct than the ad claimed.

Some of the ads that Jolly’s campaign produced were done on the cheap: One showed him standing in front of an obviously fake backdrop of the Florida coastline.

Mike Fasano, a popular former GOP state representative from nearby Pasco County, said it’s surprising, given the Republican candidate’s problems, that Jolly might still win.

“It’s not been run as I’ve seen other campaigns been run,” Fasano said. “I think he was probably getting bad advice from whoever he was getting advice from — his consultant, his campaign manager, whoever.”

Addressing a small group of reporters Wednesday, Jolly admitted his campaign lacked the money to defend himself adequately on the airwaves.

“Look, I’m a first-time candidate. I don’t come from personal wealth. I don’t come from family wealth,” he said. Sink “brought to her campaign statewide name recognition and a national party that clearly promised they’d put all the fundraising resources behind it.”

Fundraising hasn’t been Jolly’s only trouble. He’s also overseen a campaign that veteran GOP operatives describe as disjointed. Two of the campaign’s top staffers, adviser Marc Reichelderfer and communications director Sarah Bascom, have worked out of Tallahassee, a four-hour drive from St. Petersburg. Bascom, the president of a public affairs firm and a former top aide in the Florida state Senate, is a cousin of Jolly’s.

It is unusual for a communications staffer to work so far away from where a race is taking place, and Bascom’s distance from the 13th District has been a persistent source of complaints among Republicans. With her absent, Jolly often relied on a team of young aides to monitor his interviews with the parade of reporters who’ve descended on the district to write about the race.

Neither Reichelderfer nor Bascom responded to requests for comment.

The resulting media coverage has been overwhelmingly negative. On Wednesday, the Tampa Bay Times reported that Jolly’s Florida condo development is typically used by part-time residents, fueling questions about his ties to the district. In January, it was a story that he had once lobbied for companies that sought stimulus funds. A few weeks before that, the Times reported that Jolly was dating a 27-year-old former employee of his.

Behind the scenes, his campaign has caused grief for Republican leaders in Washington. The NRCC has spent nearly $2 million in the race, precious resources that could be used to help other candidates this year. But on at least two occasions, Jolly declined to say he would back Boehner as speaker. After the second response, Jolly sent out a tweet clarifying that, indeed, he would back Boehner.

That wasn’t enough for the speaker’s allies.

“After all that was done to help Jolly, his noncommittal statements on if he supports the speaker made Boehner advisers furious,” said one Republican official close to Boehner’s operation.

If Jolly has a strength as a candidate, it’s his accessibility. While Sink’s public events are tightly controlled, Jolly takes any questions thrown his way. At the diner and at a later stop at his campaign office to visit volunteers, some people wanted to talk to him about the race or about his views on a particular issue.

But other times, the conversation was more personal. At campaign headquarters, Jolly asked one of his volunteers how her preparation for the bar exam was going.

“It’s far more intimidating than it is difficult,” Jolly, an attorney by training, told her encouragingly.

Addressing a few reporters Wednesday, Jolly said he always knew the race would draw a national audience and plenty of dollars. But he seemed to acknowledge the possibility that he hadn’t done enough to stop the Democratic offensive.

“I think there’s a lot of noise out there,” he said. “And the unfortunate thing is I’m not sure voters know exactly where we stand on the issues.”