Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Greg or e who wrote (49450)	3/12/2014 5:11:39 PM
From: 2MAR$	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 69300

Sagan's program had 500mil viewers worldwide is "no substance", in what spirit fantasy world is that? That was nearly twice the population of the US at the time. And should have seen the overflowing lecture halls of every college Sagan went to, he was very beloved human being. No need to mock , you mock yourself.

To: Greg or e who wrote (49450)	3/12/2014 5:27:51 PM
From: 2MAR$	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 69300

Always too funny that those would argue against evolution, simply ignore this picture thats as large as Mt Everest right before them. Talk about intentionally being blind, for how did life start but very small basic units of single cells we divide now into three categories. What, you mean that life started out real small, basic units? Who would have predicted that? Takes real geniuses to ignore this fact of the fossil record which we have dating back to the beginning showing this. What can we conclude with 99.999999999999% accuracy? Think real hard what this means about life on earth & the first progressions

To: Greg or e who wrote (49450)	3/12/2014 5:39:12 PM
From: 2MAR$	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 69300

Basically, whether you believe in ID or not, there you have it, those pics i just fed you, life started out real small then progressed. Even an child can figure out that progression, then single celled life did evolve into colonies successive multicellular expressions from there. Only pure unadultrated 100% idiots would argue against this, it mocks human intelligence & since there are people so conflated with other issues to pursue, this only demonstrates the heart of the issue. We know life started out in very basic forms, this as i said only 99.9999999% proves the essential thesis is true, just by this one simple incontrovertable fact. Now god could have waved his hand along the line somewhere, but that "somewhere" was all the way back 3 1/2 Bil yrs, so provng Evolution isn't an issue up for debate, only for hucksters & ax grinders, who are basically total idiots when it comes to what we know scientifically

To: Greg or e who wrote (49450)	3/12/2014 5:55:55 PM
From: 2MAR$	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 69300

Well, you're going to reply or not to my post? Its pretty easy to blow away everyone with that simple realization of life beginning small here on earth, then radiating outwords towards multicellular complexity. I don't see you responding, nor can you., i just proved beyond a shadow of doubt that life evolved as sure as there is gravity. AS for the other, that was my argument for the reality of Carl Sagan's huge influence , which that confused mess of stupid propganada laughably tries to imply, he was some inferior philosopher with not as exceptional gifts as the other willy-nilly blowhard. News flash for you dumbos, when 500mil people are drawn to celebrate your efforts & applaud your POV, that pretty well blows the argument of who was superior or not.